Steven Hecht Orzack

5.6k citations
46 papers · 2.7k indexed · h-index 27

Steven Hecht Orzack

44 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Steven Hecht Orzack
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • History and Philosophy of Science 265
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 920
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 565
  • Ecological Modeling 157
  • Genetics 976
Replace M.W. Feldman with:
M.W. Feldman United States
Owen R. Jones United Kingdom
David M. Lambert New Zealand
Rebecca L. Cann United States
Clint D. Kelly Canada
Jack P. Hailman United States
A. E. Friday United Kingdom
Ashwin Narayan Jayanarayanan India
Leonard Nunney United States
H. Jane Brockmann United States
Steven Hecht Orzack relative to M.W. Feldman United States M.W. Feldman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
M.W. Feldman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven Hecht Orzack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Hecht Orzack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Hecht Orzack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Hecht Orzack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Hecht Orzack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Hecht Orzack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Hecht Orzack. The network helps show where Steven Hecht Orzack may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven Hecht Orzack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven Hecht Orzack Line = papers co-authored together Steven Hecht Orzack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Stochastic Linear Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Comparative Hypotheses [R package slouch version 2.1.4]
20203
2 20136
3 20126
4 201112
5 201112
6 201010
7 201063
8 201028
9 2008126
10 2008264
11 200531
12 2001178
13 199434
14 199440
15 199149
16 198631
17 198643
18 198544
19 198112
20 1980244

About Steven Hecht Orzack

Steven Hecht Orzack is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Genetics and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 46 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (18 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (12 papers), Plant and animal studies (10 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (5 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (5 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (265 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (920 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (565 citations). Steven Hecht Orzack has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Shripad Tuljapurkar, Elliott Sober, Thomas F. Hansen, Russell Lande, Jason Pienaar, E. Davis Parker, Ulrich K. Steiner, David Steinsaltz, J. William Stubblefield and Thomas Scholl. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution, Genetics, The American Naturalist, Theoretical Population Biology and The Quarterly Review of Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026