David Baum

10.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
133 papers, 7.2k citations indexed

About

David Baum is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, David Baum has authored 133 papers receiving a total of 7.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 76 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 69 papers in Molecular Biology and 45 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in David Baum's work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (53 papers), Plant and animal studies (33 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (27 papers). David Baum is often cited by papers focused on Plant Diversity and Evolution (53 papers), Plant and animal studies (33 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (27 papers). David Baum collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. David Baum's co-authors include Stacey D. Smith, Jeannine Cavender‐Bares, David D. Ackerly, F. A. Bazzaz, Cécile Ané, Kenneth J. Sytsma, William S. Alverson, Barbara A. Whitlock, Reto Nyffeler and Dianella G. Howarth and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The Lancet.

In The Last Decade

David Baum

127 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Hit Papers

Phylogenetic Overdispersion in Floridian Oak Communities 2004 2026 2011 2018 2004 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Baum United States 44 4.1k 3.2k 2.3k 1.4k 1.1k 133 7.2k
William J. Baker United Kingdom 45 4.5k 1.1× 2.6k 0.8× 1.5k 0.7× 1.6k 1.1× 1.5k 1.3× 201 6.9k
Vicki A. Funk United States 40 3.7k 0.9× 2.7k 0.8× 2.4k 1.1× 1.4k 1.0× 973 0.9× 170 7.2k
Quentin Cronk Canada 50 3.6k 0.9× 3.7k 1.2× 3.4k 1.5× 1.8k 1.3× 1.1k 1.0× 182 7.8k
Beryl B. Simpson United States 39 3.8k 0.9× 1.7k 0.5× 2.5k 1.1× 1.2k 0.9× 1.1k 1.0× 110 6.2k
Michael D. Crisp Australia 43 4.2k 1.0× 1.8k 0.6× 1.7k 0.8× 1.5k 1.1× 2.9k 2.5× 147 7.9k
Stephen A. Harris United Kingdom 34 2.1k 0.5× 1.4k 0.4× 1.9k 0.9× 1.3k 0.9× 597 0.5× 91 4.5k
W. John Kress United States 54 6.3k 1.5× 5.8k 1.8× 3.8k 1.7× 2.0k 1.4× 2.6k 2.3× 198 13.1k
Peter F. Stevens United States 33 2.6k 0.6× 1.8k 0.6× 2.0k 0.9× 469 0.3× 456 0.4× 100 5.1k
W. Scott Armbruster United States 53 8.7k 2.1× 2.3k 0.7× 5.7k 2.5× 1.6k 1.1× 4.3k 3.8× 171 10.3k
Charles C. Davis United States 56 6.3k 1.5× 3.9k 1.2× 3.1k 1.4× 1.3k 0.9× 2.2k 1.9× 240 10.9k

Countries citing papers authored by David Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Baum. The network helps show where David Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Baum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Baum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Baum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Baum. David Baum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Baum, David, et al.. (2025). Evolution of complexity and the transition to biochemical life. Physical review. E. 111(6). 64403–64403.
2.
Baum, David, et al.. (2023). The ecology–evolution continuum and the origin of life. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 20(208). 9 indexed citations
3.
Keefover‐Ring, Ken, et al.. (2021). Evidence for hawkmoth pollination in the chiropterophilous African baobab (Adansonia digitata). Biotropica. 54(1). 113–124. 4 indexed citations
4.
Cleaves, Henderson James, et al.. (2021). The Prebiotic Kitchen: A Guide to Composing Prebiotic Soup Recipes to Test Origins of Life Hypotheses. Life. 11(11). 1221–1221. 11 indexed citations
5.
Zizka, Alexander, Jefferson Carvalho-Sobrinho, R. Toby Pennington, et al.. (2020). Transitions between biomes are common and directional in Bombacoideae (Malvaceae). Journal of Biogeography. 47(6). 1310–1321. 36 indexed citations
6.
Mizuuchi, Ryo, et al.. (2019). Mineral surfaces select for longer RNA molecules. Chemical Communications. 55(14). 2090–2093. 24 indexed citations
7.
Conover, Justin L., Cécile Ané, Corrinne E. Grover, et al.. (2018). A Malvaceae mystery: A mallow maelstrom of genome multiplications and maybe misleading methods?. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 61(1). 12–31. 25 indexed citations
8.
Scott, Alison Dawn, et al.. (2016). Whole genome duplication in coast redwood ( Sequoia sempervirens ) and its implications for explaining the rarity of polyploidy in conifers. New Phytologist. 211(1). 186–193. 42 indexed citations
9.
Davis, Charles C., Hanno Schaefer, Zhenxiang Xi, et al.. (2014). Long-term morphological stasis maintained by a plant–pollinator mutualism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111(16). 5914–5919. 91 indexed citations
10.
Whitlock, Barbara A., Clemens Bayer, & David Baum. (2009). Phylogenetic Relationships and Floral Evolution of the Byttnerioideae (“Sterculiaceae” or Malvaceae s.l.) Based on Sequences of the Chloroplast Gene, ndhF. Systematic Botany. 26(2). 420–437. 47 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Stacey D., Cécile Ané, & David Baum. (2009). MACROEVOLUTIONARY TESTS OF POLLINATION SYNDROMES: A REPLY TO FENSTER ET AL.. Evolution. 63(10). 2763–2767. 7 indexed citations
12.
Davis, Charles C., Peter K. Endress, & David Baum. (2008). The evolution of floral gigantism. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 11(1). 49–57. 64 indexed citations
13.
Davis, Charles C., Maribeth Latvis, Daniel L. Nickrent, Kenneth J. Wurdack, & David Baum. (2007). Floral Gigantism in Rafflesiaceae. Science. 315(5820). 1812–1812. 117 indexed citations
14.
Stilio, Verónica S. Di, Elena M. Kramer, & David Baum. (2005). Floral MADS box genes and homeotic gender dimorphism in Thalictrum dioicum (Ranunculaceae) – a new model for the study of dioecy. The Plant Journal. 41(5). 755–766. 84 indexed citations
15.
Yoon, Ho‐Sung & David Baum. (2004). Transgenic study of parallelism in plant morphological evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101(17). 6524–6529. 80 indexed citations
16.
Conti, Elena, Frank Rutschmann, Torsten Eriksson, Kenneth J. Sytsma, & David Baum. (2004). CALIBRATION OF MOLECULAR CLOCKS AND THE BIOGEOGRAPHIC HISTORY OF CRYPTERONIACEAE: A REPLY TO MOYLE. Evolution. 58(8). 1874–1874. 1 indexed citations
17.
Howarth, Dianella G., Mats Gustafsson, David Baum, & Timothy J. Motley. (2003). Phylogenetics of the genus Scaevola (Goodeniaceae): implication for dispersal patterns across the Pacific Basin and colonization of the Hawaiian Islands. American Journal of Botany. 90(6). 915–923. 92 indexed citations
18.
Orzack, Steven Hecht, David Baum, H. Kern Reeve, et al.. (2001). Adaptationism and Optimality. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 178 indexed citations
19.
Alverson, William S., David Baum, & Kazuo Oginuma. (1999). A Cytological Study of Three Genera of Neotropical Bombacaceae (Clades Bombacoideae and Malvoideae). 50(2). 173–178. 3 indexed citations
20.
Baum, David. (1994). C/S apps without the heavy lifting. Datamation. 40(3). 22. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026