Steven Gottlieb

904 total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 552 citations indexed

About

Steven Gottlieb is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven Gottlieb has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 552 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1 paper in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and 1 paper in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Steven Gottlieb's work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (6 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers). Steven Gottlieb is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (6 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers). Steven Gottlieb collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and United Kingdom. Steven Gottlieb's co-authors include Eugene Golowich, John F. Donoghue, Barry R. Holstein, Andreas S. Kronfeld, Aaron Torok, Urs M. Heller, D. Toussaint, J. T. Donohue, L. Levkova and Subhasish Basak and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Today, Nuclear Physics B and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields.

In The Last Decade

Steven Gottlieb

6 papers receiving 518 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Dynamics of the Standard Model

1994 470 citations John F. Donoghue, Eugene Golowich et al. Physics Today profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Steven Gottlieb United States	4	511	79	65	39	9	6	552
G. J. Bock United States	13	375 0.7×	69 0.9×	62 1.0×	38 1.0×	8 0.9×	24	433
Claudio Dib Chile	18	862 1.7×	63 0.8×	44 0.7×	30 0.8×	5 0.6×	57	897
M. Singer United States	11	581 1.1×	90 1.1×	36 0.6×	21 0.5×	9 1.0×	34	608
N. Kraus Switzerland	7	729 1.4×	81 1.0×	43 0.7×	13 0.3×	8 0.9×	9	751
Yu-Ping Kuang China	15	928 1.8×	107 1.4×	54 0.8×	13 0.3×	17 1.9×	54	953
M. A. Shupe United States	13	455 0.9×	76 1.0×	36 0.6×	12 0.3×	10 1.1×	20	483
A. A. Natale Brazil	14	789 1.5×	98 1.2×	32 0.5×	16 0.4×	14 1.6×	76	807
S. Heppelmann United States	13	399 0.8×	23 0.3×	43 0.7×	25 0.6×	6 0.7×	23	440
A. Ya. Parkhomenko Russia	12	460 0.9×	73 0.9×	36 0.6×	58 1.5×	14 1.6×	37	475
Sumio Wada Japan	11	288 0.6×	160 2.0×	54 0.8×	90 2.3×	5 0.6×	29	331

Countries citing papers authored by Steven Gottlieb

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Gottlieb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Gottlieb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Gottlieb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Gottlieb

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Gottlieb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Gottlieb. The network helps show where Steven Gottlieb may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven Gottlieb

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven Gottlieb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven Gottlieb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven Gottlieb. Steven Gottlieb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Gottlieb, Steven, Subhasish Basak, Alexei Bazavov, et al.. (2016). Electromagnetic effects on the light pseudoscalar mesons and determination of $m_u/m_d$. 259–259. 6 indexed citations

2.

Levkova, L., Subhasish Basak, Alexei Bazavov, et al.. (2012). Status of the MILC calculation of electromagnetic contributions to pseudoscalar masses. Proceedings Of Science. 137–137. 3 indexed citations

3.

Donoghue, John F., Eugene Golowich, Barry R. Holstein, & Steven Gottlieb. (1994). Dynamics of the Standard Model. Physics Today. 47(9). 91–92. 470 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Gottlieb, Steven & Andreas S. Kronfeld. (1986). Lattice and perturbative QCD analysis of exclusive processes. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 33(1). 227–233. 28 indexed citations

5.

Gottlieb, Steven & J. T. Donohue. (1980). Comment on a proposed new anomaly. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 21(6). 1705–1708. 2 indexed citations

6.

Gottlieb, Steven. (1978). Contribution of twist-four operators to deep inelastic scattering. Nuclear Physics B. 139(1-2). 125–150. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact