Steve Jackson

27 papers receiving 187 citations

Peers

Steve Jackson
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Geometry and Topology 95
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 26
  • Mathematical Physics 62
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 64
  • Algebra and Number Theory 15
Replace Roberto Frigerio with:
Roberto Frigerio Italy
Volker Gebhardt Australia
Brigitte Mossé France
Pamela E. Harris United States
Atsushi Ishii Japan
Mojgan Mahmoudi Iran
Zhongtao Wu Hong Kong
Margarida Mendes Lopes Portugal
David C. Hunt Australia
Wilbur Whitten United States
Steve Jackson relative to Roberto Frigerio Italy Roberto Frigerio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Roberto Frigerio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Jackson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Jackson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Jackson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Jackson. The network helps show where Steve Jackson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Steve Jackson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Jackson Line = papers co-authored together Steve Jackson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202166
2 201518
3 200913
4 200212
5 201510
6
On partitions of lines and space
19948
7 19926
8 20026
9 20225
10 20035
11
On infinite partitions of lines and space
19974
12 19994
13 19904
14 19994
15 19894
16 20013
17 20073
18 19903
19
A Computation of
19993
20 20193

About Steve Jackson

Steve Jackson is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 195 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topology and Set Theory (26 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (10 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (6 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (6 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (5 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (4 papers), Functional Equations Stability Results (4 papers) and Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (95 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (26 citations), Mathematical Physics (62 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (64 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (15 citations). Steve Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and Germany. Frequent co-authors include R. Daniel Mauldin, Brandon Seward, Hyungmin Jun, Wah Chiu, Xiao Wang, Shanshan Li, Mark Bathe, William P. Bricker, Torsten John and P. Erdös. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society and Nucleic Acids Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact