Steve Black

762 citations
44 papers · 530 indexed · h-index 10
Topics
Library Science and Information Literacy (11 papers)Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (9 papers)Online and Blended Learning (9 papers)

In The Last Decade

Steve Black

36 papers receiving 494 citations

Peers

Steve Black
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Immunology 146
  • Molecular Biology 103
  • Epidemiology 82
  • Infectious Diseases 75
  • Information Systems 65
Replace Charlotte Ford with:
Charlotte Ford United States
Kathy Merlock Jackson Australia
R.J. Russell United Kingdom
Jonathon Alexis Coates United Kingdom
Kimberly Green United States
Bamini Jayabalasingham United States
Erin L. Miller United States
Anthony Bowen United States
C J Hackett United States
Carol A. Thornton United States
Steve Black relative to Charlotte Ford United States Charlotte Ford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
Charlotte Ford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Black

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Black's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Black with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Black more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Black

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Black. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Black. The network helps show where Steve Black may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steve Black

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steve Black. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steve Black based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steve Black. Steve Black is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 4
3 0
4
Insights from Educational Psychology Part 6: Diversity and Inclusion
1
5 3
6 4
7
Enhance Your Reference Skills by Knowing the Four Phases of Interest Development
1
8 5
9 286
10 1
11 0
12 1
13
Best Magazines of 2007.
1
14
Impact of full text on print journal use at a Liberal Arts College
10
15 0
16 29
17 17
18 41
19
This 'Step System' of Discipline Helps Kids Improve Their Behavior.
0
20 1

About Steve Black

Steve Black is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 44 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (11 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (9 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (42 citations), Immunology (146 citations) and Health (48 citations). Steve Black has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ennio De Gregorio, Rino Rappuoli, Christian W. Mandl, James D. Allen, P. J. McDonald, Ian Hopkinson, Richard Jones, M. R. Jones, Ross Krawczyk and G. Hunter. Their work appears in journals such as Nature reviews. Immunology, Carbohydrate Polymers and Polymer Testing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026