Stephen Young

1.6k citations
67 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Young

65 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Stephen Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Ecological Modeling 94
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 236
  • Global and Planetary Change 343
  • Ecology 377
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 247
Replace George P. Stamou with:
George P. Stamou Greece
Ants Kaasik Estonia
Sebastián Abades Chile
James N. McNair United States
Marinêz Isaac Marques Brazil
Donald L. DeAngelis United States
Jeffrey T. Kerby United States
Kevin Healy Ireland
Susan L. Durham United States
Anje‐Margriet Neutel United Kingdom
Stephen Young relative to George P. Stamou Greece George P. Stamou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
George P. Stamou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Young. The network helps show where Stephen Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Young Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015158
2 199795
3 199357
4 200745
5 200242
6 199439
7 201537
8 199332
9 196328
10 199227
11 199427
12 196526
13 198924
14 198724
15 198723
16 198123
17 201622
18 198822
19 202021
20 197418

About Stephen Young

Stephen Young is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Chemistry, Insect Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (10 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity (10 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers), Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (5 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (4 papers) and Insect Pheromone Research and Control (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (94 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (236 citations), Global and Planetary Change (343 citations), Ecology (377 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (247 citations). Stephen Young has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Penelope J. Watt, Stephen F. Nottingham, Stanley R. Herwitz, Wei Wang, Jianguo Zhu, Guopeng Ren, Lin Wang, Jim Hardie, Zhijun Wang and Yongcheng Long. Their work appears in journals such as Physiological Entomology, Journal of Experimental Biology, Animal Behaviour, Biological Conservation and Freshwater Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact