Stephen W. Peterson
- Cell Biology top 0.2%
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases 71
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food 53
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 14
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 13
- Microbiology top 2%
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Fungal Biology and Applications 9
- Infectious Diseases top 2%
- Antifungal resistance and susceptibility 15
-
- Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies 15
-
- Infectious Diseases and Mycology 12
- Co-authors
- Jens C. FrisvadRobert A. SamsonJános VargaFernando E. VegaFrancisco PosadaBruce W. HornCletus P. KurtzmanTetsuhisa Goto
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsDenmark
In The Last Decade
Stephen W. Peterson
104 papers receiving 4.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Cell Biology 2.5k
- Plant Science 2.9k
- Microbiology 42
- Pharmacology 793
- Infectious Diseases 701
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen W. Peterson
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen W. Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen W. Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen W. Peterson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen W. Peterson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen W. Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen W. Peterson. The network helps show where Stephen W. Peterson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen W. Peterson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 66 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 60 | |
| 8 | Fungal endophytes in green coffee seeds | 2008 | 13 |
| 9 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 199 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 194 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 200 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 45 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 45 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 20 | |
| 20 | 1990 | 22 |
About Stephen W. Peterson
Stephen W. Peterson is a scholar working on Microbiology, Cell Biology and Horticulture, having authored 105 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (71 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (53 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (15 papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (15 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (14 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (13 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (12 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (2.5k citations), Plant Science (2.9k citations) and Microbiology (42 citations). Stephen W. Peterson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jens C. Frisvad, Robert A. Samson, János Varga, Fernando E. Vega, Francisco Posada, Bruce W. Horn, Cletus P. Kurtzman, Tetsuhisa Goto, Yoko Itō and Donald T. Wicklow. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Molecular Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.