Stephen W. Harkins
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Physiology top 2%
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Surgery top 5%
- Co-authors
- Donald D. PriceFrancis M. BushStephen P. LongJean F. WymanJ. Andrew FantlChris I. BakerJohn R. TaylorRichard C. Chapman
- Topics
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (16 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (14 papers)Pain Management and Placebo Effect (13 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyJournal of Clinical InvestigationJournal of Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Stephen W. Harkins
77 papers receiving 4.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
- Physiology 1.1k
- Pharmacology 1.0k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 697
- Surgery 690
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen W. Harkins
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen W. Harkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen W. Harkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen W. Harkins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen W. Harkins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen W. Harkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen W. Harkins. The network helps show where Stephen W. Harkins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen W. Harkins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen W. Harkins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen W. Harkins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen W. Harkins. Stephen W. Harkins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 44 | |
| 7 | 53 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scalesbreakdown → | 947 |
| 10 | 150 | |
| 11 | Children in pain : clinical and research issues from a developmental perspective | 49 |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 68 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 310 | |
| 18 | 122 | |
| 19 | 69 | |
| 20 | 140 |
About Stephen W. Harkins
Stephen W. Harkins is a scholar working on Complementary and Manual Therapy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Research and Theory, having authored 77 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (16 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (14 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and Manual Therapy (211 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (426 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations). Stephen W. Harkins has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Donald D. Price, Francis M. Bush, Stephen P. Long, Jean F. Wyman, J. Andrew Fantl, Chris I. Baker, John R. Taylor, Richard C. Chapman, Robert P. Hart and Timothy R. Elliott. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.