Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Circumpolar Arctic vegetation map
2005837 citationsDonald A. Walker, Martha K. Raynolds et al.Journal of Vegetation Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen S. Talbot
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen S. Talbot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen S. Talbot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen S. Talbot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen S. Talbot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen S. Talbot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen S. Talbot. The network helps show where Stephen S. Talbot may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen S. Talbot
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen S. Talbot.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen S. Talbot based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen S. Talbot. Stephen S. Talbot is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Talbot, Stephen S.. (2012). Proceedings of the 7th International Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF). Flora Group Workshop: Akureyri, Iceland, January 28-February 3, 2011.4 indexed citations
3.
Talbot, Stephen S., et al.. (2011). Circumboreal Vegetation Map (CBVM): Mapping the Green Halo Concept Paper.4 indexed citations
Talbot, Stephen S., et al.. (2010). Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop: Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) Flora Group. Cir- cumboreal Vegetation Mapping (CBVM) Workshop, Helsinki, Finland, November 3-6th, 2008..1 indexed citations
Walker, Donald A., Martha K. Raynolds, Fred J.A. Daniëls, et al.. (2005). The Circumpolar Arctic vegetation map. Journal of Vegetation Science. 16(3). 267–282.837 indexed citations breakdown →
Schofield, Wilfred B., Stephen S. Talbot, & Sandra L. Talbot. (2002). Bryophytes from Tuxedni Wilderness Area, Alaska. Journal of The Hattori Botanical Laboratory. 92(92). 91–123.6 indexed citations
Talbot, Stephen S., et al.. (1988). Cicuta bulbifera L. (Umbelliferae) in Alaska. The Great Basin naturalist. 48(3). 11.1 indexed citations
16.
Talbot, Stephen S. & Carl J. Markon. (1988). Intermediate-scale vegetation mapping of Innoko National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska using Landsat MSS digital data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 54(3). 377–383.11 indexed citations
17.
Talbot, Stephen S. & Carl J. Markon. (1986). Vegetation mapping of Nowitna National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska using Landsat MSS digital data.. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 52(6). 791–799.11 indexed citations
18.
Talbot, Stephen S., et al.. (1984). Glossary of landscape & vegetation ecology for Alaska.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.