Stephen S. Gloyd

99 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Stephen S. Gloyd
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Infectious Diseases 948
  • General Health Professions 700
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 423
  • Virology 100
  • Emergency Medical Services 105
Replace Anne Cockcroft with:
Anne Cockcroft Mexico
Stephen Resch United States
Theresa Diaz United States
Mitchell D. Wong United States
Damen Haile Mariam Ethiopia
Francis Bajunirwe Uganda
Cibele Comini César Brazil
Katherine R. Sorsdahl South Africa
Victoria Pillay‐van Wyk South Africa
Rob Dorrington South Africa
Stephen S. Gloyd relative to Anne Cockcroft Mexico Anne Cockcroft's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Anne Cockcroft · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen S. Gloyd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen S. Gloyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen S. Gloyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen S. Gloyd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen S. Gloyd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen S. Gloyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen S. Gloyd. The network helps show where Stephen S. Gloyd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen S. Gloyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen S. Gloyd Line = papers co-authored together Stephen S. Gloyd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009144
2 2017144
3 2001124
4 1994122
5 2010121
6 2007116
7 2009114
8 200381
9 201479
10 201275
11 201375
12 201170
13 199569
14 200967
15 201959
16 201455
17 201451
18 199450
19 201548
20 201647

About Stephen S. Gloyd

Stephen S. Gloyd is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Virology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 103 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (30 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (17 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (9 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (6 papers), Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (4 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (4 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Reforms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (948 citations), General Health Professions (700 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (423 citations), Virology (100 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (105 citations). Stephen S. Gloyd has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mozambique and China. Frequent co-authors include James T. Pfeiffer, Kenneth Sherr, Mark A. Micek, Sarah Gimbel, Pablo Montoya Chica, Eduardo Matediana, Cynthia R. Pearson, Fátima Cuembelo, Jane M. Simoni and Bradley H. Wagenaar. Their work appears in journals such as JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, Journal of the International AIDS Society, Human Resources for Health, BMJ Global Health and International Journal of STD & AIDS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact