Stephen Prince
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 3
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 2
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Japanese History and Culture 5
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis 3
- Asian Culture and Media Studies 3
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Cinema and Media Studies 17
-
- Digital Games and Media 3
-
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology 2
- Co-authors
- Wayne E. Hensley
- Journals
- Film Quarterly (15 papers)Cinema Journal (2 papers)The Journal of Popular Culture (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomRussiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Stephen Prince
24 papers receiving 210 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 69
- Literature and Literary Theory 89
- Cultural Studies 44
- Economics and Econometrics 143
- Gender Studies 31
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Prince
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Prince's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Prince with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Prince more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Prince
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Prince. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Prince. The network helps show where Stephen Prince may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Prince, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 4 | Censorship of Japanese Films During the U.S. Occupation of Japan: The Cases of Yasujiro Ozu and Akira Kurosawa | 2009 | 1 |
| 5 | 2008 | 0 | |
| 6 | American cinema of the 1980s | 2007 | 1 |
| 7 | American Cinema of the 1980s: Themes and Variations | 2007 | 1 |
| 8 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 9 | The Horror Film | 2004 | 8 |
| 10 | Sam Peckinpah's The Wild Bunch | 1998 | 2 |
| 11 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 0 | |
| 13 | Movies and Meaning: An Introduction to Film | 1996 | 21 |
| 14 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 16 | Visions of empire : political imagery in contemporary American film | 1992 | 15 |
| 17 | 1992 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 29 | |
| 20 | 1990 | 1 |
About Stephen Prince
Stephen Prince is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Economics and Econometrics, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Music, having authored 38 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (17 papers), Japanese History and Culture (5 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (3 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (2 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (69 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (89 citations), Cultural Studies (44 citations), Economics and Econometrics (143 citations) and Gender Studies (31 citations). Stephen Prince has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wayne E. Hensley. Their work appears in journals such as Film Quarterly, Cinema Journal, The Journal of Popular Culture, International Affairs and Monumenta Nipponica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.