Stephen Parnell
Impact in
- Horticulture top 1%
- Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
- Plant Science top 2%
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance
- Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
- Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Papers in
-
- Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy 8
- Co-authors
- Frank van den BoschT. R. GottwaldChristopher A. GilliganNik J. CunniffeC. A. GilliganC. Jessica E. MetcalfBritt KoskellaClive H. Bock
- Journals
- Phytopathology (10 papers)PLoS Computational Biology (4 papers)Journal of Theoretical Biology (3 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Stephen Parnell
55 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Horticulture 123
- Plant Science 909
- Insect Science 263
- Cell Biology 272
- Ecological Modeling 59
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Parnell
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Parnell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Parnell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Parnell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Parnell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Parnell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Parnell. The network helps show where Stephen Parnell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Parnell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 45 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 132 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 44 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 40 |
About Stephen Parnell
Stephen Parnell is a scholar working on Horticulture, Library and Information Sciences, Endocrinology, Plant Science and Insect Science, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Virus Research Studies (22 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (17 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (16 papers), Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (14 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (13 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (8 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (7 papers) and Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (123 citations), Plant Science (909 citations), Insect Science (263 citations), Cell Biology (272 citations) and Ecological Modeling (59 citations). Stephen Parnell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Frank van den Bosch, T. R. Gottwald, Christopher A. Gilligan, Nik J. Cunniffe, C. A. Gilligan, C. Jessica E. Metcalf, Britt Koskella, Clive H. Bock, Nathan Brown and Alexander Mastin. Their work appears in journals such as Phytopathology, PLoS Computational Biology, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Scientific Reports and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.