Hannah Fielder

606 total citations
10 papers, 317 citations indexed

About

Hannah Fielder is a scholar working on Plant Science, Endocrinology and Food Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Hannah Fielder has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 317 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Plant Science, 3 papers in Endocrinology and 2 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in Hannah Fielder's work include Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies (5 papers), Agricultural pest management studies (4 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (4 papers). Hannah Fielder is often cited by papers focused on Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies (5 papers), Agricultural pest management studies (4 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (4 papers). Hannah Fielder collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Canada. Hannah Fielder's co-authors include Nigel Maxted, Nora P Castañeda Álvarez, Blanca León, John H. Wiersema, Shelagh Kell, Luigi Guarino, Ruth J. Eastwood, Holly Vincent, B. V. Ford‐Lloyd and John J. Hopkins and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Biological Conservation and Phytopathology.

In The Last Decade

Hannah Fielder

10 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Hannah Fielder United Kingdom	6	263	90	47	45	40	10	317
Mauricio Parra‐Quijano Colombia	12	231 0.9×	115 1.3×	33 0.7×	59 1.3×	52 1.3×	25	335
Xitlali Aguirre‐Dugua Mexico	8	106 0.4×	60 0.7×	65 1.4×	88 2.0×	58 1.4×	17	233
Simon Kallow United Kingdom	9	245 0.9×	44 0.5×	61 1.3×	75 1.7×	14 0.3×	19	343
Evans Mutegi United States	10	188 0.7×	139 1.5×	34 0.7×	23 0.5×	20 0.5×	18	311
Abdoul‐Aziz Saïdou Niger	7	210 0.8×	157 1.7×	36 0.8×	67 1.5×	15 0.4×	22	335
Fernando Hernández Argentina	12	351 1.3×	60 0.7×	65 1.4×	53 1.2×	14 0.3×	30	431
J. L. Pham France	10	265 1.0×	174 1.9×	77 1.6×	86 1.9×	73 1.8×	23	409
Gregory Kenicer United Kingdom	9	334 1.3×	79 0.9×	111 2.4×	190 4.2×	17 0.4×	20	442
Nathalie Galic France	12	385 1.5×	184 2.0×	20 0.4×	55 1.2×	16 0.4×	15	458
Anicet G. Dassou Benin	9	165 0.6×	45 0.5×	36 0.8×	93 2.1×	19 0.5×	29	294

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Fielder

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Fielder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Fielder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Fielder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Fielder

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Fielder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Fielder. The network helps show where Hannah Fielder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah Fielder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah Fielder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah Fielder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah Fielder. Hannah Fielder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Beale, Tim, Roger Day, Hannah Fielder, et al.. (2024). Horizon scanning: Tools to identify emerging threats to plant health in a changing world. EPPO Bulletin. 54(S1). 73–88. 5 indexed citations

2.

Fielder, Hannah, Tim Beale, Michael Jeger, et al.. (2024). A Synoptic Review of Plant Disease Epidemics and Outbreaks Published in 2022. Phytopathology. 114(8). 1717–1732. 5 indexed citations

3.

Jeger, M. J., Hannah Fielder, Tim Beale, et al.. (2023). What Can Be Learnt by a Synoptic Review of Plant Disease Epidemics and Outbreaks Published in 2021. Preprints.org. 1 indexed citations

4.

Jeger, Michael, Hannah Fielder, Tim Beale, et al.. (2023). What Can Be Learned by a Synoptic Review of Plant Disease Epidemics and Outbreaks Published in 2021?. Phytopathology. 113(7). 1141–1158. 8 indexed citations

5.

Jeger, M. J., Hannah Fielder, Tim Beale, et al.. (2022). A Synoptic Review of Plant Disease Epidemics and Outbreaks Published in 2021. Preprints.org. 1 indexed citations

6.

Fielder, Hannah, et al.. (2015). Enhancing the Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives in England. PLoS ONE. 10(6). e0130804–e0130804. 45 indexed citations

7.

Fielder, Hannah, et al.. (2015). Enhancing the conservation of crop wild relatives in Wales. New Journal of Botany. 5(3). 178–191. 1 indexed citations

8.

Jarvis, Susan G., et al.. (2015). Distribution of crop wild relatives of conservation priority in the UK landscape. Biological Conservation. 191. 444–451. 30 indexed citations

9.

Fielder, Hannah, et al.. (2015). Enhancing the conservation of crop wild relatives in Scotland. Journal for Nature Conservation. 29. 51–61. 9 indexed citations

10.

Vincent, Holly, John H. Wiersema, Shelagh Kell, et al.. (2013). A prioritized crop wild relative inventory to help underpin global food security. Biological Conservation. 167. 265–275. 212 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact