Stephen M. Schwebel

38 papers receiving 117 citations

Peers

Stephen M. Schwebel
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Political Science and International Relations 126
  • Strategy and Management 69
  • Sociology and Political Science 51
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 28
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 20
Replace C F Amerasinghe with:
C F Amerasinghe United States
Klabbers Finland
Frederic L. Kirgis United States
Prosper Weil France
Charles N. Brower United States
H. Thirlway Switzerland
Keith Highet United Kingdom
Roger P. Alford United States
Henry G. Schermers Netherlands
Eric De Brabandere Hungary
Stephen M. Schwebel relative to C F Amerasinghe United States C F Amerasinghe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
C F Amerasinghe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen M. Schwebel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen M. Schwebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen M. Schwebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen M. Schwebel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen M. Schwebel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen M. Schwebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen M. Schwebel. The network helps show where Stephen M. Schwebel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen M. Schwebel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen M. Schwebel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen M. Schwebel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen M. Schwebel. Stephen M. Schwebel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2
Humanizing the Laws of War: Selected Writings of Richard Baxter
2
3 4
4 1
5 0
6
The Overwhelming Merits of Bilateral Investment Treaties
4
7 1
8 1
9 2
10 14
11 1
12 1
13 13
14 1
15 5
16 1
17 19
18 3
19
Higgins: The Development of International Law Through the Political Organs of the United Nations
0
20 18

About Stephen M. Schwebel

Stephen M. Schwebel is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations and Law, having authored 47 papers that have together received 189 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Arbitration and Investment Law (24 papers), International Law and Human Rights (21 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (126 citations), Strategy and Management (69 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (28 citations). Stephen M. Schwebel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Bebr, David P. Stewart, Rosalyn Higgins, L. Gray Cowan, Richard Gardiner, Daniel Barstow Magraw, Theodor Meron, Frederick M. Abbott, Edith Brown Weiss and Francis Gurry. Their work appears in journals such as The Yale Law Journal, American Journal of International Law and International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026