Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
1992946 citationsEdith Brown WeissInternational Legal Materialsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Edith Brown Weiss
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Brown Weiss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Brown Weiss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Brown Weiss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Brown Weiss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Brown Weiss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Brown Weiss. The network helps show where Edith Brown Weiss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edith Brown Weiss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edith Brown Weiss.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edith Brown Weiss based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Edith Brown Weiss. Edith Brown Weiss is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Weiss, Edith Brown. (2010). On Being Accountable in a Kaleidoscopic World. eYLS (Yale Law School).1 indexed citations
6.
Abbott, Frederick M., Thomas Cottier, Francis Gurry, et al.. (2008). ILM Volume 47 Issue 4 Cover and Front matter. International Legal Materials. 47(4). f1–f18.1 indexed citations
7.
Weiss, Edith Brown. (2004). The Law of International Watercourses. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 779–781.3 indexed citations
Weiss, Edith Brown. (2000). The Rise or the Fall of International Law. Fordham law review. 69(2). 345.6 indexed citations
10.
Weiss, Edith Brown, et al.. (1999). The World Bank, international financial institutions, and the development of international law. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
11.
Weiss, Edith Brown. (1998). Understanding Compliance with International Environmental Agreements: The Baker's Dozen Myths. University of Richmond law review. 32(5). 1555–1589.16 indexed citations
12.
Weiss, Edith Brown. (1998). International environmental law and policy. Medical Entomology and Zoology.12 indexed citations
13.
Weiss, Edith Brown. (1997). International compliance with nonbinding accords.10 indexed citations
14.
Weiss, Edith Brown. (1992). In Fairness To Future Generations and Sustainable Development. American University international law review. 8(1). 2.61 indexed citations
15.
Weiss, Edith Brown. (1992). Environmental change and international law: new challenges and dimensions..38 indexed citations
Weiss, Edith Brown. (1989). New Directions for the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: A Commentary. Chicago-Kent law review. 65(2). 375.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.