Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The case for RAMClouds
2010334 citationsJohn K. Ousterhout, Parag Agrawal et al.ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Reviewprofile →
Fast crash recovery in RAMCloud
2011273 citationsStephen M. Rumble, Ryan Stutsman et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen M. Rumble
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen M. Rumble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen M. Rumble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen M. Rumble more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen M. Rumble
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen M. Rumble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen M. Rumble. The network helps show where Stephen M. Rumble may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen M. Rumble
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen M. Rumble.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen M. Rumble based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen M. Rumble. Stephen M. Rumble is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Cidon, Asaf, et al.. (2017). Memshare: a dynamic multi-tenant key-value cache. USENIX Annual Technical Conference. 321–334.32 indexed citations
2.
Ousterhout, John K., Ashish Gupta, Behnam Montazeri, et al.. (2015). The RAMCloud Storage System. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems. 33(3). 1–55.172 indexed citations
Cidon, Asaf, Stephen M. Rumble, Ryan Stutsman, et al.. (2013). Copysets: reducing the frequency of data loss in cloud storage. USENIX Annual Technical Conference. 37–48.87 indexed citations
5.
Rumble, Stephen M., et al.. (2011). It's time for low latency. 11–11.99 indexed citations
6.
Ousterhout, John K., Parag Agrawal, David Erickson, et al.. (2011). The case for RAMCloud. Communications of the ACM. 54(7). 121–130.116 indexed citations
7.
Rumble, Stephen M., et al.. (2011). Fast crash recovery in RAMCloud. 29–41.273 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Lagar-Cavilla, H. Andrés, Michael Brudno, Eyal de Lara, et al.. (2011). SnowFlock. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems. 29(1). 1–45.20 indexed citations
Ousterhout, John K., Parag Agrawal, David Erickson, et al.. (2010). The case for RAMClouds. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review. 43(4). 92–105.334 indexed citations breakdown →
Lagar-Cavilla, H. Andrés, Adin Scannell, Stephen M. Rumble, et al.. (2009). SnowFlock. 1–12.280 indexed citations
14.
Rumble, Stephen M., Ryan Stutsman, Philip Levis, David Mazières, & Nickolai Zeldovich. (2009). Apprehending joule thieves with cinder. 49–54.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.