Stephen L. Love

1.1k total citations
45 papers, 718 citations indexed

About

Stephen L. Love is a scholar working on Plant Science, Food Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen L. Love has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 718 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Plant Science, 21 papers in Food Science and 9 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Stephen L. Love's work include Plant Pathogens and Resistance (24 papers), Potato Plant Research (21 papers) and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (10 papers). Stephen L. Love is often cited by papers focused on Plant Pathogens and Resistance (24 papers), Potato Plant Research (21 papers) and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (10 papers). Stephen L. Love collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Stephen L. Love's co-authors include David A. Fischhoff, Terry B. Stone, G. L. Reed, Gregory B. Parker, Sylvia A. McPherson, Frederick J. Perlak, J. J. Pavek, Bahman Shafii, Timothy J. Herrman and Asunta L. Thompson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Plant Molecular Biology and Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.

In The Last Decade

Stephen L. Love

42 papers receiving 651 citations

Peers

Stephen L. Love
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Plant Science 578
  • Food Science 327
  • Molecular Biology 275
  • Insect Science 89
  • Biotechnology 72
Replace Giancarlo Scalabrelli with:
Giancarlo Scalabrelli Italy
Tian Lin China
Danuta Strzelczyk‐Żyta Poland
William M. Roca Colombia
Andrew McLachlan New Zealand
Alberto Iandolino United States
Svetlana Radović Serbia
Albertus Eskes France
B. V. Ford-Lloyd United Kingdom
Jim Lorenzen United States
Giancarlo Scalabrelli Italy View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Stephen L. Love
Stephen L. Love · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Stephen L. Love
Stephen L. Love · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen L. Love

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen L. Love's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen L. Love with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen L. Love more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen L. Love

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen L. Love. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen L. Love. The network helps show where Stephen L. Love may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen L. Love

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen L. Love. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen L. Love based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen L. Love. Stephen L. Love is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 2
3 4
4 4
5 6
6 1
7
In Vitro Screening of Potato Genotypes for Resistance to Common Scab Using Thaxtomin A
2
8
Evaluation of Potato Varieties with High Antioxidant Activities by Measuring Phenolic Acids in Different Tuber Parts
5
9 32
10 43
11 44
12 3
13 3
14 12
15 22
16 4
17 239
18 3
19 4
20 3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026