B. V. Ford-Lloyd
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Insect Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- H. J. NewburyNigel MaxtedShelagh KellÁlvaro ToledoEhsan DullooJames A. CallowJohn DowdleJeremy Pritchard
- Topics
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration (10 papers)Garlic and Onion Studies (3 papers)Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyDenmark
In The Last Decade
B. V. Ford-Lloyd
32 papers receiving 677 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Plant Science 643
- Molecular Biology 368
- Genetics 117
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 93
- Insect Science 57
Countries citing papers authored by B. V. Ford-Lloyd
This map shows the geographic impact of B. V. Ford-Lloyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. V. Ford-Lloyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. V. Ford-Lloyd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by B. V. Ford-Lloyd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. V. Ford-Lloyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. V. Ford-Lloyd. The network helps show where B. V. Ford-Lloyd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. V. Ford-Lloyd
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. V. Ford-Lloyd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. V. Ford-Lloyd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B. V. Ford-Lloyd. B. V. Ford-Lloyd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Genetic reserve conservation of European crop wild relative and landrace diversity | 0 |
| 2 | 106 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 67 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 52 | |
| 7 | Realistic population and molecular genetic approaches to genetic assessment. | 1 |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 144 | |
| 11 | 55 | |
| 12 | Biodiversity for bioindustries. | 2 |
| 13 | Use of molecular marker techniques for description of plant genetic variation. | 35 |
| 14 | Conservation of DNA: DNA banking. | 8 |
| 15 | 82 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | Plant genetic resources - a perspective. | 4 |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About B. V. Ford-Lloyd
B. V. Ford-Lloyd is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Biotechnology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 771 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (10 papers), Garlic and Onion Studies (3 papers) and Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (643 citations), Horticulture (11 citations) and Molecular Biology (368 citations). B. V. Ford-Lloyd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include H. J. Newbury, Nigel Maxted, Shelagh Kell, Álvaro Toledo, Ehsan Dulloo, James A. Callow, John Dowdle, Jeremy Pritchard, Mark R. Macnair and Nicholas Smirnoff. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Molecular Ecology and Journal of Applied Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.