Countries citing papers authored by Stephen L. Kajewski
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen L. Kajewski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen L. Kajewski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen L. Kajewski more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen L. Kajewski
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen L. Kajewski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen L. Kajewski. The network helps show where Stephen L. Kajewski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen L. Kajewski
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen L. Kajewski.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen L. Kajewski based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen L. Kajewski. Stephen L. Kajewski is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cheung, Esther, Albert P.C. Chan, & Stephen L. Kajewski. (2012). Factors contributing to successful public private partnership projects : comparing Hong Kong with Australia and the United Kingdom. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).18 indexed citations
4.
Kajewski, Stephen L., et al.. (2011). The importance of project governance framework in project procurement planning. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).4 indexed citations
5.
Kajewski, Stephen L., et al.. (2010). Factors contributing to ethical issues in project procurement planning: a case study in Malaysia. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 244. 33–37.11 indexed citations
Cheung, Esther, Albert P.C. Chan, & Stephen L. Kajewski. (2009). Enhancing value for money in public private partnership projects : findings from a survey conducted in Hong Kong and Australia compared to findings from previous research in the UK. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).7 indexed citations
Kajewski, Stephen L., et al.. (2008). Value mapping for urban infrastructure projects: Mapping project outcomes to corporate objectives. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 76(16). 728–31.
12.
Chan, Albert P.C., et al.. (2007). From BOT to PPP - a Hong Kong example. PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University).6 indexed citations
Kajewski, Stephen L., et al.. (2003). The Implementation of Online Information Technology (ICT) on Remote Construction Projects. Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering.2 indexed citations
15.
Kajewski, Stephen L., et al.. (2003). Online Remote Construction Management ; A State of the Art Report. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).1 indexed citations
Kajewski, Stephen L., et al.. (2002). Internet-Based communication and Information Systems on Remote Construction Projects - A Case Study Analysis. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).1 indexed citations
Kajewski, Stephen L., et al.. (2001). A brief synopsis in the use of ICT and ICPM in the construction industry.2 indexed citations
20.
Kajewski, Stephen L.. (1996). PBL and Construction Management Education: An independent Learning Case Study. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.