Stephen Kaffka
Impact in
- Soil Science top 5%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Irrigation Practices and Water Management
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Bioenergy crop production and management
Papers in
- Soil Science 16
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics 7
- Irrigation Practices and Water Management 6
-
- Bioenergy crop production and management 6
- Co-authors
- Elias BassilDennis L. CorwinScott M. LeschJ. D. OsterEun‐Mi KohAlyson E. MitchellR. Ford DenisonDiane M. Barrett
- Journals
- Agricultural Water Management (3 papers)Agronomy Journal (2 papers)Geoderma (2 papers)Ecological Applications (2 papers)Environmental Science & Technology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChile
In The Last Decade
Stephen Kaffka
47 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Soil Science 276
- Agronomy and Crop Science 181
- Environmental Engineering 241
- Biochemistry 86
- Plant Science 506
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Kaffka
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Kaffka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Kaffka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Kaffka more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Kaffka
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Kaffka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Kaffka. The network helps show where Stephen Kaffka may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Kaffka, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 51 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 254 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 10 | |
| 18 | Farming in transition: Analysis – Scientists and farmers try new approach to researchpeer-reviewed | 1994 | 2 |
| 19 | Scientists and farmers try new approach to research. | 1994 | 2 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3 |
About Stephen Kaffka
Stephen Kaffka is a scholar working on Soil Science, Agronomy and Crop Science, Environmental Chemistry, Environmental Engineering and Plant Science, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (7 papers), Irrigation Practices and Water Management (6 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (6 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (5 papers), Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (5 papers), Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (5 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (5 papers) and Climate change impacts on agriculture (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (276 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (181 citations), Environmental Engineering (241 citations), Biochemistry (86 citations) and Plant Science (506 citations). Stephen Kaffka has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Elias Bassil, Dennis L. Corwin, Scott M. Lesch, J. D. Oster, Eun‐Mi Koh, Alyson E. Mitchell, R. Ford Denison, Diane M. Barrett, Keith L. Kline and Virginia H. Dale. Their work appears in journals such as Agricultural Water Management, Agronomy Journal, Geoderma, Ecological Applications and Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.