Stephen K. Powers

50 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Stephen K. Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Toxicology 42
  • Neurology 180
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 385
  • Internal Medicine 43
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 218
Replace Sandip Biswal with:
Sandip Biswal United States
Hirokuni Yoshimura Japan
Alejandro Santillán United States
C. M. Carapella Italy
Takashi Ueda Japan
Hiroshi Sugiura Japan
Ichiro Yamada Japan
Yotaro Izumi Japan
Fred W. Hetzel United States
Dan J. Castro United States
Stephen K. Powers relative to Sandip Biswal United States Sandip Biswal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Sandip Biswal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen K. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen K. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen K. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen K. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen K. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen K. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen K. Powers. The network helps show where Stephen K. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen K. Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen K. Powers Line = papers co-authored together Stephen K. Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198697
2 200070
3 199067
4 199163
5 200057
6 198253
7 199941
8 198741
9 198640
10 199439
11 198638
12 198837
13 198436
14 198236
15 198534
16 198931
17 198928
18 198728
19 198327
20 198725

About Stephen K. Powers

Stephen K. Powers is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (15 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (9 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (6 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (5 papers), Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (5 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (4 papers) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (42 citations), Neurology (180 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (385 citations), Internal Medicine (43 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (218 citations). Stephen K. Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include J. Tony Brown, Satish Krishnamurthy, Michael S. B. Edwards, Michael R. Detty, Timothy A. Turvey, G. Yancey Gillespie, Paul B. Merkel, William C. Beckman, Lester Kwock and Sharon Cush. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, Journal of neurosurgery, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, Journal of Neuro-Oncology and Photochemistry and Photobiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact