Dan Stone

51 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

Dan Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • History 125
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 82
  • Emergency Medicine 78
  • Political Science and International Relations 168
  • Sociology and Political Science 219
Replace Sebastián Roché with:
Sebastián Roché France
Stephanie Newell United Kingdom
David W. Lloyd United States
Peter Hodgkinson United Kingdom
Harry Blagg Australia
Marius Turda United Kingdom
Carlos A Carcach Australia
Douglas Sharp United States
Peter P. Lejins United States
Randolph Roth United States
Dan Stone relative to Sebastián Roché France Sebastián Roché's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26×
Sebastián Roché · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Stone. The network helps show where Dan Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Dan Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Stone Line = papers co-authored together Dan Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200463
2 199940
3 200940
4
Hannah Arendt and the Uses of History: Imperialism, Nation, Race, and Genocide
200736
5 200034
6
Breeding Superman: Nietzsche, Race and Eugenics in Edwardian and Interwar Britain
200234
7 200226
8 200424
9 201324
10 200621
11 200420
12 200118
13 200815
14 200312
15 199612
16 200511
17 200810
18 20039
19 20189
20 20119

About Dan Stone

Dan Stone is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 67 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (21 papers), European history and politics (14 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (6 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (5 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (5 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers), Medical History and Research (4 papers) and Communism, Protests, Social Movements (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (125 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (82 citations), Emergency Medicine (78 citations), Political Science and International Relations (168 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (219 citations). Dan Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Alistair Morrison, Richard H. King, N V Doraiswamy, Deborah Shipton, David Clark, Kwamena Sekyi Dickson, Avril Blamey, Mhairi Mackenzie, Kirsten Major and Fotios C. Papadopoulos. Their work appears in journals such as Patterns of Prejudice, Journal of Genocide Research, Injury Prevention, Rethinking History and The Journal of Modern History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026