Stephen J. Loeb

8.7k citations
171 papers · 7.7k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 47
Topics
Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (88 papers)Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (57 papers)Magnetism in coordination complexes (55 papers)
Partner nations
CanadaUnited StatesChina

In The Last Decade

Stephen J. Loeb

170 papers receiving 7.4k citations

Hit Papers

Amide based receptors for anions20032026201020182003100200300400500

Peers

Stephen J. Loeb
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Organic Chemistry 5.2k
  • Materials Chemistry 3.2k
  • Spectroscopy 3.2k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 2.7k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.3k
Replace Markus Albrecht with:
Markus Albrecht Germany
Tatsuya Nabeshima Japan
Mir Wais Hosseini France
Darren W. Johnson United States
Jack K. Clegg Australia
Keith Man‐Chung Wong Hong Kong
Shigehisa Akine Japan
Javier de Mendoza Spain
Takahiro Kusukawa Japan
Peter N. Horton United Kingdom
Stephen J. Loeb relative to Markus Albrecht Germany Markus Albrecht's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Markus Albrecht · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Loeb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Loeb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Loeb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Loeb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Loeb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Loeb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Loeb. The network helps show where Stephen J. Loeb may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen J. Loeb

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen J. Loeb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen J. Loeb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen J. Loeb. Stephen J. Loeb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2 1
3 26
4 8
5 24
6 32
7 55
8 27
9 10
10 3
11 131
12 206
13 34
14 19
15 17
16 11
17 25
18 72
19 84
20 25

About Stephen J. Loeb

Stephen J. Loeb is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 171 papers that have together received 7.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (88 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (57 papers) and Magnetism in coordination complexes (55 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (2.7k citations), Spectroscopy (3.2k citations) and Organic Chemistry (5.2k citations). Stephen J. Loeb has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include V. Nicholas Vukotic, Chantelle R. Bondy, Kelong Zhu, James A. Wisner, Gregory J. E. Davidson, Philip A. Gale, Robert W. Schurko, J. Kickham, D.J. Hoffart and Jorge Tiburcio. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Society Reviews and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026