James E. M. Lewis

4.9k total citations
86 papers, 4.1k citations indexed

About

James E. M. Lewis is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, James E. M. Lewis has authored 86 papers receiving a total of 4.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 64 papers in Organic Chemistry, 25 papers in Materials Chemistry and 24 papers in Inorganic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in James E. M. Lewis's work include Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (42 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (17 papers) and Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (15 papers). James E. M. Lewis is often cited by papers focused on Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (42 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (17 papers) and Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (15 papers). James E. M. Lewis collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. James E. M. Lewis's co-authors include James D. Crowley, Stephen M. Goldup, Marzia Galli, R. S. Nyholm, Scott A. Cameron, Emma L. Gavey, Dan Preston, G. Wilkinson, Brian F. G. Johnson and P. W. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Chemical Society Reviews.

In The Last Decade

James E. M. Lewis

82 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James E. M. Lewis United Kingdom 39 3.2k 1.4k 1.3k 1.0k 902 86 4.1k
Gerhard Baum Germany 39 3.8k 1.2× 2.5k 1.8× 1.2k 1.0× 1.2k 1.2× 866 1.0× 138 5.2k
Masahide Tominaga Japan 25 3.1k 1.0× 2.0k 1.5× 1.5k 1.2× 1.1k 1.1× 1.0k 1.2× 123 4.6k
Paul N. W. Baxter France 33 1.9k 0.6× 1.0k 0.8× 1.3k 1.0× 1.0k 1.0× 688 0.8× 71 3.3k
Jonathon E. Beves Australia 35 2.7k 0.8× 1.0k 0.7× 1.9k 1.5× 657 0.7× 1.1k 1.2× 101 4.4k
Nathalie Kyritsakas France 41 2.5k 0.8× 2.1k 1.5× 1.8k 1.4× 1.4k 1.4× 887 1.0× 178 4.9k
Takahiro Kusukawa Japan 35 4.1k 1.3× 2.3k 1.7× 2.0k 1.6× 1.3k 1.3× 1.5k 1.7× 95 5.6k
Stephan Menzer United Kingdom 40 3.5k 1.1× 853 0.6× 1.8k 1.4× 674 0.7× 1.6k 1.8× 99 4.7k
S. Russell Seidel United States 15 2.0k 0.6× 1.8k 1.3× 953 0.8× 1.2k 1.2× 695 0.8× 16 3.1k
Jean‐Marie Lehn France 10 1.9k 0.6× 768 0.6× 1.4k 1.1× 527 0.5× 1.2k 1.3× 11 3.9k
Michaele J. Hardie United Kingdom 44 3.6k 1.1× 2.4k 1.8× 1.9k 1.5× 1.2k 1.2× 1.7k 1.9× 154 5.6k

Countries citing papers authored by James E. M. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. M. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. M. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. M. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. M. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. M. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. M. Lewis. The network helps show where James E. M. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. M. Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. M. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. M. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James E. M. Lewis. James E. M. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Lewis, James E. M., et al.. (2024). Supramolecular and molecular capsules, cages and containers. Chemical Society Reviews. 53(21). 10380–10408. 39 indexed citations
3.
Tarzia, Andrew, Víctor Posligua, Louise Male, et al.. (2024). A Combined Experimental and Computational Exploration of Heteroleptic cis ‐Pd 2 L 2 L’ 2 Coordination Cages through Geometric Complementarity. Chemistry - A European Journal. 31(1). e202403336–e202403336. 4 indexed citations
4.
Tarzia, Andrew, et al.. (2023). Diastereoselective Self‐Assembly of Low‐Symmetry Pd n L 2 n Nanocages through Coordination‐Sphere Engineering**. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 62(51). e202315451–e202315451. 27 indexed citations
5.
Tarzia, Andrew, et al.. (2023). Diastereoselective Self‐Assembly of Low‐Symmetry PdnL2n Nanocages through Coordination‐Sphere Engineering**. Angewandte Chemie. 135(51). 2 indexed citations
6.
Lewis, James E. M.. (2022). Pseudo‐heterolepticity in Low‐Symmetry Metal‐Organic Cages. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 61(44). e202212392–e202212392. 41 indexed citations
7.
Lewis, James E. M.. (2022). Pseudo‐heterolepticity in Low‐Symmetry Metal‐Organic Cages. Angewandte Chemie. 134(44). 3 indexed citations
8.
Zhang, Zhi‐Hui, Floriana Tuna, Heiko Bamberger, et al.. (2021). Rotaxane CoII Complexes as Field‐Induced Single‐Ion Magnets. Angewandte Chemie. 133(29). 16187–16194. 1 indexed citations
9.
Tarzia, Andrew, James E. M. Lewis, & Kim E. Jelfs. (2021). High‐Throughput Computational Evaluation of Low Symmetry Pd 2 L 4 Cages to Aid in System Design**. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 60(38). 20879–20887. 50 indexed citations
10.
Tarzia, Andrew, James E. M. Lewis, & Kim E. Jelfs. (2021). High‐Throughput Computational Evaluation of Low Symmetry Pd2L4Cages to Aid in System Design**. Angewandte Chemie. 133(38). 21047–21055. 7 indexed citations
11.
Summers, Peter A., et al.. (2021). Rotaxanes as Cages to Control DNA Binding, Cytotoxicity, and Cellular Uptake of a Small Molecule**. Angewandte Chemie. 133(19). 11023–11029. 7 indexed citations
12.
Yu, Shilin, James E. M. Lewis, Vicente Martí‐Centelles, et al.. (2021). Damming an electronic energy reservoir: ion-regulated electronic energy shuttling in a [2]rotaxane. Chemical Science. 12(26). 9196–9200. 5 indexed citations
13.
Summers, Peter A., et al.. (2021). Rotaxanes as Cages to Control DNA Binding, Cytotoxicity, and Cellular Uptake of a Small Molecule**. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 60(19). 10928–10934. 52 indexed citations
14.
Zhang, Zhi‐Hui, Floriana Tuna, Heiko Bamberger, et al.. (2021). Rotaxane Co II Complexes as Field‐Induced Single‐Ion Magnets. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 60(29). 16051–16058. 26 indexed citations
15.
White, Andrew J. P., et al.. (2020). Self-assembly of a porous metallo-[5]rotaxane. Chemical Communications. 56(72). 10453–10456. 12 indexed citations
16.
Lewis, James E. M. & James D. Crowley. (2020). Metallo‐Supramolecular Self‐Assembly with Reduced‐Symmetry Ligands. ChemPlusChem. 85(5). 815–827. 117 indexed citations
17.
Lewis, James E. M., Andrew Tarzia, Andrew J. P. White, & Kim E. Jelfs. (2019). Conformational control of Pd2L4 assemblies with unsymmetrical ligands. Chemical Science. 11(3). 677–683. 119 indexed citations
18.
Lewis, James E. M.. (2019). Self-templated synthesis of amide catenanes and formation of a catenane coordination polymer. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 17(9). 2442–2447. 15 indexed citations
19.
Lewis, James E. M., Paul D. Beer, Stephen J. Loeb, & Stephen M. Goldup. (2017). Metal ions in the synthesis of interlocked molecules and materials. Chemical Society Reviews. 46(9). 2577–2591. 206 indexed citations
20.
Ngo, Thien H., Jan Labuta, Gary N. Lim, et al.. (2017). Porphyrinoid rotaxanes: building a mechanical picket fence. Chemical Science. 8(9). 6679–6685. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026