Stephen J. Lewis
- Surgery top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lawrence G. LenkeKeith H. BridwellMichael G. FehlingsEric M. MassicotteKathy BlankeY. Raja RampersaudK W HeatonChristopher I. Shaffrey
- Topics
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (71 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (68 papers)Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (58 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen J. Lewis
120 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Surgery 3.1k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.4k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 327
- Molecular Biology 307
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 229
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Lewis. The network helps show where Stephen J. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen J. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen J. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen J. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen J. Lewis. Stephen J. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 70 | |
| 15 | 87 | |
| 16 | 47 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 64 | |
| 20 | 49 |
About Stephen J. Lewis
Stephen J. Lewis is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Gastroenterology, having authored 136 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (71 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (68 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (58 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.4k citations), Surgery (3.1k citations) and Gastroenterology (195 citations). Stephen J. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence G. Lenke, Keith H. Bridwell, Michael G. Fehlings, Eric M. Massicotte, Kathy Blanke, Y. Raja Rampersaud, K W Heaton, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Charles G. Fisher and Marcel F. Dvorak. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Gut.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.