Stephen J. DeMaso
- Ecology top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Co-authors
- Fred S. GutheryJeffrey J. LuskFidel HernándezLeonard A. BrennanDavid B. WesterMarkus J. PetersonDavid M. LeslieRobert L. Lochmiller
- Topics
- Avian ecology and behavior (38 papers)Rangeland and Wildlife Management (25 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (24 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsJournal of Wildlife Management
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Stephen J. DeMaso
57 papers receiving 912 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Ecology 880
- Global and Planetary Change 238
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 216
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 119
- Ecological Modeling 91
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. DeMaso
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. DeMaso's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. DeMaso with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. DeMaso more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. DeMaso
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. DeMaso. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. DeMaso. The network helps show where Stephen J. DeMaso may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen J. DeMaso
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen J. DeMaso. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen J. DeMaso based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen J. DeMaso. Stephen J. DeMaso is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 118 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 46 | |
| 20 | Using supplemental food and its influence on survival of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) | 41 |
About Stephen J. DeMaso
Stephen J. DeMaso is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecological Modeling, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Avian ecology and behavior (38 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (25 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (880 citations), Ecological Modeling (91 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (216 citations). Stephen J. DeMaso has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Fred S. Guthery, Jeffrey J. Lusk, Fidel Hernández, Leonard A. Brennan, David B. Wester, Markus J. Peterson, David M. Leslie, Robert L. Lochmiller, M. Clay Green and Thomas B. Hardy. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Journal of Wildlife Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.