Stephen H. Cruikshank
- Surgery top 10%
- Rheumatology top 2%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Urology top 10%
- Co-authors
- S. Robert KovacMichael W. StanleyLinda F. CarsonJohn T. CrossonDerryl E. BlockSteven G. SmithAnna F. FaragoMarcia S. Brose
- Topics
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments (13 papers)Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (7 papers)Ureteral procedures and complications (7 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyEuropean Journal of CancerObstetrics and Gynecology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Stephen H. Cruikshank
32 papers receiving 713 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Surgery 500
- Rheumatology 448
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 284
- Reproductive Medicine 164
- Urology 62
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen H. Cruikshank
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen H. Cruikshank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen H. Cruikshank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen H. Cruikshank more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen H. Cruikshank
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen H. Cruikshank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen H. Cruikshank. The network helps show where Stephen H. Cruikshank may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen H. Cruikshank
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen H. Cruikshank. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen H. Cruikshank based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen H. Cruikshank. Stephen H. Cruikshank is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 91 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 67 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 93 | |
| 14 | 92 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 47 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 35 |
About Stephen H. Cruikshank
Stephen H. Cruikshank is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rheumatology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 33 papers that have together received 776 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (13 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (7 papers) and Ureteral procedures and complications (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (284 citations), Rheumatology (448 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (164 citations). Stephen H. Cruikshank has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include S. Robert Kovac, Michael W. Stanley, Linda F. Carson, John T. Crosson, Derryl E. Block, Steven G. Smith, Anna F. Farago, Marcia S. Brose, M.C. Cox and Afshin Dowlati. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, European Journal of Cancer and Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.