Stephen H. Bennett
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Robert C. HoyeMichael P. ShermanJayme L. WaldronJ. William FutrellShane M. WelchJoel A. RothAlfred S. KetchamCharles Bevins
- Topics
- Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (12 papers)Amphibian and Reptile Biology (10 papers)Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGambiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen H. Bennett
52 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Nutrition and Dietetics 248
- Global and Planetary Change 234
- Ecology 222
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 216
- Molecular Biology 193
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen H. Bennett
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen H. Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen H. Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen H. Bennett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen H. Bennett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen H. Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen H. Bennett. The network helps show where Stephen H. Bennett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen H. Bennett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen H. Bennett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen H. Bennett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen H. Bennett. Stephen H. Bennett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | Pine Barrens Treefrog | 1 |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | Longleaf Pine Reptile Guild | 0 |
| 9 | 96 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Stephen H. Bennett
Stephen H. Bennett is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (12 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (10 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (92 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (248 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (184 citations). Stephen H. Bennett has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Gambia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert C. Hoye, Michael P. Sherman, Jayme L. Waldron, J. William Futrell, Shane M. Welch, Joel A. Roth, Alfred S. Ketcham, Charles Bevins, Glenn W. Geelhoed and Jay M. Milstein. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Cancer and Journal of Applied Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.