Stephen Folger

744 citations
14 papers · 556 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Folger

13 papers receiving 541 citations

Peers

Stephen Folger
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 388
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 25
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 82
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 53
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 50
Replace Tamaki Miyamoto with:
Tamaki Miyamoto Japan
Arihiro Hatta Japan
C. Ervin Davis United States
Ikuko Sato‐Suzuki Japan
Marie-Noële Magnié-Mauro France
Frank Marzinzik Germany
Takuro Higashiura Japan
Takeshi Kaneda Japan
Boris Kleber Denmark
Amy Parkinson United Kingdom
Stephen Folger relative to Tamaki Miyamoto Japan Tamaki Miyamoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tamaki Miyamoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Folger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Folger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Folger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Folger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Folger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Folger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Folger. The network helps show where Stephen Folger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Folger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Folger Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Folger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2007283
2
Changes in EEG during graded exercise on a recumbent cycle ergometer.
200896
3 201036
4 199731
5 199926
6 200824
7 201417
8 200816
9 201912
10 19969
11 20062
12 20142
13 20041
14 20191

About Stephen Folger

Stephen Folger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 556 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (388 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (25 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (82 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (53 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (50 citations). Stephen Folger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Gregory Essick, Francis McGlone, Vinay Tannan, Grace T. Baranek, Kevin A. Pelphrey, Carissa J. Cascio, Paul Miller, Eric E. Hall, Edward F. Kelly and Mark Tommerdahl. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Journal of Visualized Experiments, International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact