Stephen E. Nash

22 papers receiving 243 citations

Peers

Stephen E. Nash
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Archeology 22
  • Space and Planetary Science 19
  • Paleontology 81
  • Museology 26
  • Atmospheric Science 134
Replace Elizabeth S. Chilton with:
Elizabeth S. Chilton United States
Sharon R. Stocker United States
Lisa Janz United States
Karen Schollmeyer United States
Brian Reeves Canada
Anne Crone United Kingdom
David Davison Australia
Alan Saville United Kingdom
Thomas F. Strasser United States
Mark J. Lynott United States
Stephen E. Nash relative to Elizabeth S. Chilton United States Elizabeth S. Chilton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Elizabeth S. Chilton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Nash. The network helps show where Stephen E. Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Nash Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Nash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199878
2 200230
3 202026
4 201125
5 201019
6 201716
7 199711
8 201410
9 20138
10 20107
11
Crossroads of Culture: Anthropology Collections at the Denver Museum of Nature & Science
20107
12 20184
13 20114
14
A history of archaeological tree-ring dating: 1914-1945
19973
15 20103
16 20173
17 20123
18 20133
19
A Cutting-Date Estimation Method for Two Archaeologically Important Tree Species
19932
20
Safety Management: Creating a Custom Approach for a Mega Infrastructure Project
20121

About Stephen E. Nash

Stephen E. Nash is a scholar working on Space and Planetary Science, Archeology, Paleontology, Museology and Anthropology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (11 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (9 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (5 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (5 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (4 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (4 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (3 papers) and Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (22 citations), Space and Planetary Science (19 citations), Paleontology (81 citations), Museology (26 citations) and Atmospheric Science (134 citations). Stephen E. Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Chip Colwell‐Chanthaphonh, Chip Colwell, Steven R. Holen, Peter M. Brown, Douglas Kline, Carolyn A. Copenheaver, Roger Anyon, Jakob Sedig, Darrell Creel and Daniel Griffin. Their work appears in journals such as American Antiquity, Museum Anthropology, Geoarchaeology, KIVA and Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026