Citations per year, relative to Stephen Daniels Stephen Daniels (= 1×)
peers
Roy B. Flemming
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Daniels
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Daniels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Daniels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Daniels more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Daniels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Daniels. The network helps show where Stephen Daniels may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Daniels
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Daniels.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Daniels based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Daniels. Stephen Daniels is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Daniels, Stephen. (2019). Human Rights Education in Scotland: Challenges and Opportunities. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).1 indexed citations
3.
Acee, Taylor W., et al.. (2017). Student-Perceived Interferences to College and Mathematics Success. Journal of developmental education. 40(2). 2–9.3 indexed citations
4.
Daniels, Stephen & Joanne Martin. (2016). WHERE HAVE ALL THE CASES GONE? THE STRANGE SUCCESS OF TORT REFORM REVISITED [Dagger]. Emory law journal. 65(6). 1445.2 indexed citations
Daniels, Stephen, et al.. (2014). Analyzing Carnegie's Reach: The Contingent Nature of Innovation. Journal of legal education. 63(4). 585.1 indexed citations
7.
Daniels, Stephen & Joanne Martin. (2014). Plaintiffs' Lawyers: Dealing with the Possible but Not Certain. The De Paul law review. 60(2). 337.
8.
Daniels, Stephen & Joanne Martin. (2014). The Texas Two-Step: Evidence on the Link between Damage Caps and Access to the Civil Justice System. The De Paul law review. 55(2). 635.2 indexed citations
9.
Daniels, Stephen & Joanne Martin. (2014). "The Impact That It Has Had Is between People's Ears": Tort Reform, Mass Culture, and Plaintiffs' Lawyers. The De Paul law review. 50(2). 453.3 indexed citations
Daniels, Stephen & Joanne Martin. (2006). Texas Plaintiffs’ Practice in the Age of Tort Reform: Survival of the Fittest — It’s Even More True Now. eYLS (Yale Law School). 51(2). 286–320.4 indexed citations
12.
Daniels, Stephen & Joanne Martin. (2006). Plaintiffs' Lawyers, Specialization, and Medical Malpractice. Vanderbilt law review. 59(4). 1051.2 indexed citations
13.
Daniels, Stephen, et al.. (2004). Art of the garden : the garden in British art, 1800 to the present day.4 indexed citations
14.
Daniels, Stephen & Joanne Martin. (2002). It Was the Best of Times, It Was the Worst of Times: The Precarious Nature of Plaintiffs' Practice in Texas. Texas law review. 80(7). 1781.16 indexed citations
Daniels, Stephen. (1980). The Supreme Court and Obscenity: An Exercise in Empirical Constitutional Policy-Making. San Diego law review. 17(4). 757.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.