Stephen D. Murphy
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 1%
- Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems 8
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 21
- Plant Science top 1%
- Weed Control and Herbicide Applications 16
- Soil Science top 5%
-
- Plant and animal studies 17
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 9
-
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 8
-
- Environmental Conservation and Management 7
-
- Forest Management and Policy 7
- Co-authors
- Clarence J. SwantonDavid R. ClémentsLonnie W. AarssenE. S. RomanDiane L. BenoîtB. D. BoothStéphan WeiseA. Gordon Thomas
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Stephen D. Murphy
83 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Agronomy and Crop Science 587
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 583
- Plant Science 1.5k
- Soil Science 303
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 547
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. Murphy
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. Murphy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. Murphy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. Murphy. The network helps show where Stephen D. Murphy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen D. Murphy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 14 | Restoring the natural forest on an overgrazed sheep station | 2014 | 1 |
| 15 | 2009 | 28 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 141 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 116 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 139 | |
| 20 | Simulation of pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) seedling emergence in different tillage systems | 1997 | 17 |
About Stephen D. Murphy
Stephen D. Murphy is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 84 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (21 papers), Plant and animal studies (17 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (16 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (9 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (8 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (8 papers), Environmental Conservation and Management (7 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (587 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (583 citations) and Plant Science (1.5k citations). Stephen D. Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Clarence J. Swanton, David R. Cléments, Lonnie W. Aarssen, E. S. Roman, Diane L. Benoît, B. D. Booth, Stéphan Weise, A. Gordon Thomas, Svenja Belaoussoff and Peter G. Kevan. Their work appears in journals such as Restoration Ecology, Weed Science, Environmental Management, American Journal of Botany and Weed Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.