Nancy Shackelford
- Ecology top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rachel J. StandishAlexander S. MoffettSahotra SarkarTodd E. EricksonRichard J. HobbsMichael RentonBrian M. StarzomskiMichael P. Perring
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (22 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (12 papers)Land Use and Ecosystem Services (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONETrends in Ecology & Evolution
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Nancy Shackelford
41 papers receiving 985 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Ecology 363
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 336
- Global and Planetary Change 304
- Plant Science 192
- Ecological Modeling 172
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Shackelford
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Shackelford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Shackelford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Shackelford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Shackelford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Shackelford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Shackelford. The network helps show where Nancy Shackelford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy Shackelford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy Shackelford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy Shackelford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy Shackelford. Nancy Shackelford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 37 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 127 |
About Nancy Shackelford
Nancy Shackelford is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (22 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (12 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (172 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (336 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (304 citations). Nancy Shackelford has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rachel J. Standish, Alexander S. Moffett, Sahotra Sarkar, Todd E. Erickson, Richard J. Hobbs, Michael Renton, Brian M. Starzomski, Michael P. Perring, Lauren M. Hallett and Cristina E. Ramalho. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.