Stephen D. Glasgow
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Richard BoyceAntoine AdamantidisSylvain WilliamsTimothy E. KennedyEdward S. RuthazerC. Andrew ChapmanDenis BurdakovCarolina Gutierrez Herrera
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (14 papers)Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (7 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Stephen D. Glasgow
16 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Cognitive Neuroscience 812
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 715
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 365
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 192
- Molecular Biology 176
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. Glasgow
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. Glasgow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. Glasgow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. Glasgow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. Glasgow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. Glasgow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. Glasgow. The network helps show where Stephen D. Glasgow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen D. Glasgow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen D. Glasgow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen D. Glasgow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen D. Glasgow. Stephen D. Glasgow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | 37 | |
| 5 | 54 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 54 | |
| 8 | Causal evidence for the role of REM sleep theta rhythm in contextual memory consolidationbreakdown → | 444 |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 105 | |
| 11 | 95 | |
| 12 | 303 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 46 |
About Stephen D. Glasgow
Stephen D. Glasgow is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (14 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (7 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (365 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (812 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (715 citations). Stephen D. Glasgow has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Richard Boyce, Antoine Adamantidis, Sylvain Williams, Timothy E. Kennedy, Edward S. Ruthazer, C. Andrew Chapman, Denis Burdakov, Carolina Gutierrez Herrera, Sonia Jego and Mats I. Ekstrand. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Neuroscience and Nature Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.