Stephen Bull

520 citations
9 papers · 42 · h-index 4

Impact in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy
    • Library Science and Administration
    • Web and Library Services
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
    • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior

Papers in

Stephen Bull

8 papers receiving 39 citations

Peers

Stephen Bull
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Library and Information Sciences 15
  • Information Systems 21
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 1
  • Gender Studies 5
  • Communication 3
Replace Alison Harding with:
Alison Harding United States
Robert James United Kingdom
Georgina Parsons United Kingdom
Lisa Spiro United States
Andrew D. Osborn
Ian Willison United Kingdom
Normann Witzleb Australia
Kubo Mač‰ák United Kingdom
Erawadi Erawadi Indonesia
Abdul Salam Indonesia
Stephen Bull relative to Alison Harding United States Alison Harding's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Alison Harding · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Bull

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Bull's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Bull with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Bull more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Bull

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Bull. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Bull. The network helps show where Stephen Bull may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Bull, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Bull Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Bull links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201014
2 201411
3 20167
4 20143
5 20153
6
Library Services Roadshow: Taking 'The Library' to the Students
20142
7
Pierre Bourdieu (1930–2002)
20121
8
How we FindIt@Bham using Primo
20141
9 20190

About Stephen Bull

Stephen Bull is a scholar working on Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Education, having authored 9 papers that have together received 42 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (5 papers), Web and Library Services (3 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (2 papers), Library Science and Administration (2 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (1 paper), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (1 paper) and Science Education and Perceptions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (15 citations), Information Systems (21 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (1 citation), Gender Studies (5 citations) and Communication (3 citations). Stephen Bull has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Helen Cooper, James W. Barnett and Catherine Robertson. Their work appears in journals such as New Review of Academic Librarianship, Screen, Journal of Information Literacy and ePapers Repository (University of Birmingham).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact