Ian Willison
Impact in
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Modernist Literature and Criticism
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- Joseph Conrad and Literature
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Samuel Beckett and Modernism
Papers in
-
- Joseph Conrad and Literature 1
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 1
-
- Library Science and Information Systems 2
- Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 1
- Co-authors
- Warwick Gould (1 shared paper)Warren Chernaik (1 shared paper)Andrew Nash (1 shared paper)Simon Eliot (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Logos (1 paper)IFLA Journal (1 paper)Journal of American Studies (1 paper)Library History (1 paper)SAS-Space (University of London) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ian Willison
7 papers receiving 26 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Literature and Literary Theory 42
- Library and Information Sciences 5
- History 13
- General Psychology 1
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 1
Countries citing papers authored by Ian Willison
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Willison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Willison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Willison more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Willison
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Willison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Willison. The network helps show where Ian Willison may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Ian Willison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 38 | |
| 2 | Literary cultures and the material book | 2007 | 9 |
| 3 | The national library in historical perspective | 1989 | 6 |
| 4 | 1978 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 6 | The commonwealth of books : essays and studies in honour of Ian Willison | 2007 | 2 |
| 7 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1967 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 0 | |
| 11 | The History of the Book as a Field of Study within the Humanities | 2006 | 0 |
About Ian Willison
Ian Willison is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Information Systems, Conservation, Sociology and Political Science and Anthropology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 61 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital and Traditional Archives Management (2 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (1 paper), Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (1 paper), Joseph Conrad and Literature (1 paper), Literature: history, themes, analysis (1 paper) and Library Science and Administration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (42 citations), Library and Information Sciences (5 citations), History (13 citations), General Psychology (1 citation) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (1 citation). Ian Willison has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Warwick Gould, Warren Chernaik, Andrew Nash and Simon Eliot. Their work appears in journals such as Logos, IFLA Journal, Journal of American Studies, Library History and SAS-Space (University of London).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.