Lisa Spiro

537 citations
13 papers · 43 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Lisa Spiro

12 papers receiving 31 citations

Peers

Lisa Spiro
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Conservation 8
  • Library and Information Sciences 3
  • Communication 11
  • Computer Science Applications 6
  • Literature and Literary Theory 12
Replace Amy Earhart with:
Amy Earhart United States
Eva Hourihan Jansen Canada
Fei Deng China
Lyndon Ormond-Parker Australia
Elizabeth Marshman Canada
Jon Gregson Nepal
Giorgio Pasquali Italy
Eileen Gardiner United Kingdom
Andrew G. Watson United States
Liana Ermakova France
Lisa Spiro relative to Amy Earhart United States Amy Earhart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Amy Earhart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Spiro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Spiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Spiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Spiro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Spiro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Spiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Spiro. The network helps show where Lisa Spiro may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Lisa Spiro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisa Spiro Line = papers co-authored together Lisa Spiro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200710
2 20147
3 20156
4
Knowing and Doing: Understanding the Digital Humanities Curriculum.
20115
5
The Idea of Order: Transforming Research Collections for 21st Century Scholarship. CLIR Publication No. 147.
20104
6 20034
7
Establishing a "Resilient Network" for Digital Humanities.
20171
8
The Shoah Visual History Archive: Experience from the Classroom
20051
9 20061
10 20151
11 20081
12
Managing Information Overload
20101
13 20061

About Lisa Spiro

Lisa Spiro is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Communication and Social Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 43 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Humanities and Scholarship (4 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper), Web Data Mining and Analysis (1 paper), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Photography and Visual Culture (1 paper) and Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (8 citations), Library and Information Sciences (3 citations), Communication (11 citations), Computer Science Applications (6 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (12 citations). Lisa Spiro has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Vivian Lewis, Roger Schonfeld, Alison Hicks, Michael Stephens, Paul N. Courant, Matthew E. Nielsen, Andrea Larson, Michael Decker and Patricia H. Werhane. Their work appears in journals such as Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, First Monday, Book history, Literary and Linguistic Computing and Rice Digital Scholarship Archive (Rice University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact