Stephen Breen

1.4k citations
50 papers · 1.0k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Breen

50 papers receiving 982 citations

Peers

Stephen Breen
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Radiation 552
  • Otorhinolaryngology 132
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 558
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 405
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 127
Replace Eliana Vásquez Osorio with:
Eliana Vásquez Osorio United Kingdom
Rolf Bendl Germany
C. Lafond France
Michalis Aristophanous United States
Juan David Ospina France
Erwin Bellon Belgium
I. Dell’Oca Italy
Linda J. Brewster United States
C. Rowbottom United Kingdom
Stephen Breen relative to Eliana Vásquez Osorio United Kingdom Eliana Vásquez Osorio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Eliana Vásquez Osorio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Breen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Breen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Breen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Breen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Breen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Breen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Breen. The network helps show where Stephen Breen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Breen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Breen Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Breen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008116
2 2007110
3 201196
4 200888
5 200870
6 201063
7 201462
8 200838
9 201038
10 200930
11 201229
12 200427
13 200722
14 201519
15 201116
16 201015
17 200815
18 200512
19 201012
20 201211

About Stephen Breen

Stephen Breen is a scholar working on Radiation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Otorhinolaryngology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (35 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (16 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (8 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (7 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (6 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (6 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (552 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (132 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (558 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (405 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (127 citations). Stephen Breen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include David A. Jaffray, Jolie Ringash, Vladimír Pekar, Brian O’Sullivan, Louis Fenkell, Monique van Prooijen, Michael B. Sharpe, Stéphane Allaire, Laura A. Dawson and John Waldron. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Medical Physics, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Physics in Medicine and Biology and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact