Thomas G. Purdie
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 0.5%
- Radiation top 0.1%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 1%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Michael B. SharpeDavid A. JaffrayAndrea BezjakChris McIntoshAndrea McNivenD MoseleyJean-Pierre BissonnetteK. Franks
- Topics
- Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (62 papers)Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (35 papers)Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (25 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaNew ZealandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Thomas G. Purdie
92 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.5k
- Radiation 2.4k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.6k
- Biomedical Engineering 763
- Surgery 279
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas G. Purdie
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas G. Purdie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas G. Purdie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas G. Purdie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas G. Purdie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas G. Purdie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas G. Purdie. The network helps show where Thomas G. Purdie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas G. Purdie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas G. Purdie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas G. Purdie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas G. Purdie. Thomas G. Purdie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 114 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 141 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 138 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | Deformable 4DCT Lung Registration with Vessel Bifurcations | 5 |
| 18 | 100 | |
| 19 | 124 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Thomas G. Purdie
Thomas G. Purdie is a scholar working on Radiation, Health Informatics and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 95 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (62 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (35 papers) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (2.4k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.5k citations) and Health Informatics (115 citations). Thomas G. Purdie has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, New Zealand and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Michael B. Sharpe, David A. Jaffray, Andrea Bezjak, Chris McIntosh, Andrea McNiven, D Moseley, Jean-Pierre Bissonnette, K. Franks, Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen and Mattea Welch. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology and European Journal of Operational Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.