Stephen B. Dobranski
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 1
- History top 10%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 1
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 2
-
- Geographies of human-animal interactions 1
-
- Freedom of Expression and Defamation 1
-
- Caribbean and African Literature and Culture 1
-
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis 1
-
- Lexicography and Language Studies 1
- Co-authors
- John RumrichJohn P. CareyWilliam KerriganRay SiemensColin BurrowCedric BrownThomas N. CornsBarbara Kiefer Lewalski
- Journals
- PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (1 paper)English Literary Renaissance (1 paper)Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Stephen B. Dobranski
11 papers receiving 52 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Literature and Literary Theory 44
- Classics 12
- History 26
- History and Philosophy of Science 8
- Philosophy 16
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen B. Dobranski
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen B. Dobranski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen B. Dobranski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen B. Dobranski more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen B. Dobranski
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen B. Dobranski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen B. Dobranski. The network helps show where Stephen B. Dobranski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Stephen B. Dobranski, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 8 | Readers and authorship in early modern England | 2005 | 23 |
| 9 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 25 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 28 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 16 | A Variorum Commentary on the Poems of John Milton | 1970 | 1 |
About Stephen B. Dobranski
Stephen B. Dobranski is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 101 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), Geographies of human-animal interactions (1 paper), Freedom of Expression and Defamation (1 paper), Caribbean and African Literature and Culture (1 paper), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (1 paper), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (1 paper) and Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (44 citations), Classics (12 citations) and History (26 citations). Stephen B. Dobranski has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include John Rumrich, John P. Carey, William Kerrigan, Ray Siemens, Colin Burrow, Cedric Brown, Thomas N. Corns, Barbara Kiefer Lewalski, Martin Dzelzainis and Joan S. Bennett. Their work appears in journals such as PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, English Literary Renaissance and Studies in English Literature 1500-1900.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.