Stéphanie Volders

442 total citations
8 papers, 327 citations indexed

About

Stéphanie Volders is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Physiology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Stéphanie Volders has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 327 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Pharmacology, 5 papers in Physiology and 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Stéphanie Volders's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers). Stéphanie Volders is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers). Stéphanie Volders collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Sweden. Stéphanie Volders's co-authors include Johan W.S. Vlaeyen, Ann Meulders, Steven De Peuter, Tom Van Daele, Rob Smeets, Jeroen R. de Jong, Marlies den Hollander, Mariëlle E. J. B. Goossens, Yannick Boddez and Bram Vervliet and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Psychology Review, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Stéphanie Volders

8 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stéphanie Volders Netherlands	7	187	138	97	75	60	8	327
Stéphanie Cormier Canada	7	120 0.6×	146 1.1×	82 0.8×	69 0.9×	57 0.9×	21	342
T. Kronfli United States	5	215 1.1×	127 0.9×	124 1.3×	132 1.8×	40 0.7×	9	389
Rena Gatzounis Belgium	9	154 0.8×	129 0.9×	79 0.8×	65 0.9×	48 0.8×	21	268
Sin Ki Ng Australia	8	182 1.0×	65 0.5×	75 0.8×	45 0.6×	18 0.3×	8	302
Tatsuyuki Arimura Japan	9	149 0.8×	63 0.5×	157 1.6×	33 0.4×	60 1.0×	17	313
Alexa Huber Italy	10	83 0.4×	161 1.2×	147 1.5×	57 0.8×	54 0.9×	14	318
Michelle J. Verrier Canada	8	173 0.9×	91 0.7×	156 1.6×	63 0.8×	66 1.1×	11	329
Pär Flodin Sweden	11	129 0.7×	183 1.3×	169 1.7×	94 1.3×	27 0.5×	17	434
Rie Iwaki Japan	10	136 0.7×	52 0.4×	158 1.6×	52 0.7×	65 1.1×	11	360
Katharina Schmidt Germany	11	87 0.5×	244 1.8×	80 0.8×	125 1.7×	37 0.6×	31	360

Countries citing papers authored by Stéphanie Volders

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stéphanie Volders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stéphanie Volders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stéphanie Volders more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stéphanie Volders

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stéphanie Volders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stéphanie Volders. The network helps show where Stéphanie Volders may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stéphanie Volders

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stéphanie Volders. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stéphanie Volders based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stéphanie Volders. Stéphanie Volders is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Meulders, Ann, Tom Van Daele, Stéphanie Volders, & Johan W.S. Vlaeyen. (2016). The use of safety-seeking behavior in exposure-based treatments for fear and anxiety: Benefit or burden? A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review. 45. 144–156. 55 indexed citations

Khatibi, Ali, et al.. (2015). Sub-optimal presentation of painful facial expressions enhances readiness for action and pain perception following electrocutaneous stimulation. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 913–913. 7 indexed citations

Volders, Stéphanie, Yannick Boddez, Steven De Peuter, Ann Meulders, & Johan W.S. Vlaeyen. (2014). Avoidance behavior in chronic pain research: A cold case revisited. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 64. 31–37. 67 indexed citations

Volders, Stéphanie, Ann Meulders, Steven De Peuter, & Johan W.S. Vlaeyen. (2014). The Reduction of Fear of Movement-related Pain. Clinical Journal of Pain. 31(11). 933–945. 20 indexed citations

Demoulin, Christophe, Ivan Huijnen, Stéphanie Grosdent, et al.. (2013). Relationship between different measures of pain-related fear and physical capacity of the spine in patients with chronic low back pain. The Spine Journal. 13(9). 1039–1047. 48 indexed citations

Volders, Stéphanie, Ann Meulders, Steven De Peuter, Bram Vervliet, & Johan W.S. Vlaeyen. (2012). Safety behavior can hamper the extinction of fear of movement-related pain: An experimental investigation in healthy participants. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 50(11). 735–746. 48 indexed citations

Hollander, Marlies den, Jeroen R. de Jong, Stéphanie Volders, et al.. (2010). Fear reduction in patients with chronic pain: a learning theory perspective. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 10(11). 1733–1745. 80 indexed citations

Peuter, Steven De, et al.. (2009). 990 PAIN‐RELATED FEAR AND CHRONIC PAIN: INTEROCEPTIVE FEAR CONDITIONING AS A NOVEL APPROACH. European Journal of Pain. 13(S1). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact