Stephanie Schulz
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Physiology top 5%
- Immunology top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Scott A. WaldmanGiovanni M. PitariJason Y. ParkShiva KazerounianDavid L. GarbersPeter S.T. YuenKenneth P. ChepenikJieru E. Lin
- Topics
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (13 papers)Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (12 papers)Digestive system and related health (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaItaly
In The Last Decade
Stephanie Schulz
52 papers receiving 3.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Molecular Biology 1.5k
- Oncology 743
- Physiology 635
- Immunology 593
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 431
Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Schulz
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Schulz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Schulz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Schulz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Schulz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Schulz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Schulz. The network helps show where Stephanie Schulz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Schulz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Schulz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Schulz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Schulz. Stephanie Schulz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | Abstract #4412: GUCY2C establishes lineage dependence in intestinal tumorigenesis through AKT | 1 |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 101 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 46 | |
| 11 | 50 | |
| 12 | 116 | |
| 13 | 94 | |
| 14 | 84 | |
| 15 | 104 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | Guanylyl cyclase is a heat-stable enterotoxin receptorbreakdown → | 509 |
About Stephanie Schulz
Stephanie Schulz is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Toxicology and Biotechnology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (13 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (12 papers) and Digestive system and related health (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (376 citations), Gastroenterology (171 citations) and Physiology (132 citations). Stephanie Schulz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Scott A. Waldman, Giovanni M. Pitari, Jason Y. Park, Shiva Kazerounian, David L. Garbers, Peter S.T. Yuen, Kenneth P. Chepenik, Jieru E. Lin, Terry Hyslop and D L Garbers. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.