Nikola Stenzel

1.2k citations
35 papers · 523 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Nikola Stenzel

28 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers

Nikola Stenzel
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Applied Psychology 54
  • Clinical Psychology 175
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 109
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 72
  • General Health Professions 139
Replace Parvez Thekkumpurath with:
Parvez Thekkumpurath United Kingdom
Dionisios Bratis Greece
Hye Yoon Park South Korea
G. Moussas Greece
Margarita Staniūtė Lithuania
Catharina Welin Sweden
Rie Lambæk Mikkelsen Denmark
Emily R. Hauck United States
Charlotte Garrett United Kingdom
C. Virginia O’Hayer United States
Nikola Stenzel relative to Parvez Thekkumpurath United Kingdom Parvez Thekkumpurath's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Parvez Thekkumpurath · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nikola Stenzel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nikola Stenzel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nikola Stenzel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nikola Stenzel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nikola Stenzel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nikola Stenzel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nikola Stenzel. The network helps show where Nikola Stenzel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nikola Stenzel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nikola Stenzel Line = papers co-authored together Nikola Stenzel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200961
2 201349
3 201244
4 201539
5 201436
6 201831
7 201731
8 201631
9 202130
10 201630
11 201527
12 201017
13 201616
14 201916
15 202115
16 20219
17 20158
18 20125
19 20125
20 20154

About Nikola Stenzel

Nikola Stenzel is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 35 papers that have together received 523 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (12 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (8 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Health and Wellbeing Research (6 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (3 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (54 citations), Clinical Psychology (175 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (109 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (72 citations) and General Health Professions (139 citations). Nikola Stenzel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Winfried Rief, Klaus Kenn, Ricarda Mewes, Johannes A. C. Laferton, Elmar Brähler, Susanne Fischer, Alexandra Martin, Heide Glaesmer, Stefan Krumm and Wolfgang Schürmann. Their work appears in journals such as Chronic Respiratory Disease, Psychology and Health, Frontiers in Psychiatry, BMJ Open and Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact