Stephanie Geise

29 papers receiving 314 citations

Peers

Stephanie Geise
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Sociology and Political Science 170
  • Communication 153
  • Literature and Literary Theory 63
  • Artificial Intelligence 33
  • Political Science and International Relations 31
Replace Brooke Barnett with:
Brooke Barnett United States
Katharina Lobinger Switzerland
Tijana Milošević Ireland
Franziska Marquart Netherlands
Perry Parks United States
Catherine A. Luther United States
Lukas Otto Germany
Hoon Lee South Korea
Martina Temmerman Belgium
Stephanie Geise relative to Brooke Barnett United States Brooke Barnett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Brooke Barnett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Geise

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Geise's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Geise with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Geise more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Geise

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Geise. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Geise. The network helps show where Stephanie Geise may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Geise

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Geise. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Geise based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Geise. Stephanie Geise is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 4
4 7
5 1
6 5
7 11
8 1
9 13
10 0
11 1
12 12
13
European Public Sphere| Online News, Social Media and European Union Attitudes: A Multidimensional Analysis
5
14
Online News, Social Media, and European Union Attitudes: A Multidimensional Analysis
6
15 24
16
What is Visual Framing Research? A Systematic Overview of an Emerging Field of (Visual) Communication Research
2
17 176
18 3
19
Context Effects in News Reception
1
20 1

About Stephanie Geise

Stephanie Geise is a scholar working on Communication, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and General Social Sciences, having authored 35 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (11 papers), Social Media and Politics (10 papers) and Visual Culture and Art Theory (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (153 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (63 citations) and General Social Sciences (18 citations). Stephanie Geise has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Christian Baden, Marion Müller, Diana Panke, Thomas J. Johnson, Renita Coleman, Christian Nuernbergk, Christian Katzenbach, Rachel R. Mourão, Merja Mahrt and Melanie Leidecker-Sandmann. Their work appears in journals such as New Media & Society, Communication Theory and Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026