Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Johnson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Johnson. The network helps show where Thomas J. Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Johnson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Johnson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Johnson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Johnson. Thomas J. Johnson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jia, Chenyan & Thomas J. Johnson. (2021). Source Credibility Matters: Does Automated Journalism Inspire Selective Exposure?. International journal of communication. 15. 22.13 indexed citations
6.
Johnson, Thomas J., Magdalena Saldaña, & Barbara K. Kaye. (2020). Think the Vote: Information Processing, Selective Exposure to Social Media, and Support for Trump and Clinton. International journal of communication. 14. 25.3 indexed citations
7.
Johnson, Thomas J., et al.. (2018). Social networking site as a Political Filtering Machine: Predicting the Act of Political Unfriending and Hiding on Social Networking Sites. Social Media + Society. 7(2). 92–119.7 indexed citations
8.
Lu, Shuning, et al.. (2017). Putting out fire with gasoline in Tahrir Square: Revisiting the Gamson hypothesis.. International journal of communication. 11. 23.4 indexed citations
9.
Mourão, Rachel R., et al.. (2015). European Public Sphere| Online News, Social Media and European Union Attitudes: A Multidimensional Analysis. International journal of communication. 9. 24.5 indexed citations
10.
Mourão, Rachel R., et al.. (2015). Online News, Social Media, and European Union Attitudes: A Multidimensional Analysis. International journal of communication. 9(1). 3199–3222.6 indexed citations
11.
Kim, Daekyung, Hyunwoo Kim, & Thomas J. Johnson. (2011). Third-Person Perception of User-Generated Online Political Messages and the Relationship with Government Regulation in South Korea. 8. 23–47.1 indexed citations
12.
Harlow, Summer & Thomas J. Johnson. (2011). The Arab Spring| Overthrowing the Protest Paradigm? How The New York Times, Global Voices and Twitter Covered the Egyptian Revolution. International journal of communication. 5. 16.56 indexed citations
Johnson, Thomas J.. (2006). Atmospheric Excitation of Newly Observed Short Period Retrograde Loops in Polar Motion. AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts. 2007.1 indexed citations
16.
Kosek, W., et al.. (2005). A comparison of LOD and UT1-UTC forecasts by different combined prediction techniques. 40(2). 119–125.18 indexed citations
Johnson, Thomas J.. (1972). A Macro View of Process Evaluation..1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.