Stephanie Dean

412 citations
24 papers · 275 indexed · h-index 9
Topics
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers)Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (2 papers)Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (2 papers)
Journals
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Science of The Total EnvironmentActa Neuropathologica
Partner nations
United StatesCanadaChina

In The Last Decade

Stephanie Dean

20 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Stephanie Dean
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 90
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 70
  • Molecular Biology 54
  • Genetics 46
  • Clinical Psychology 31
Replace Matthew Sussman with:
Matthew Sussman United States
W.A.W. Walters Australia
Zain Al-Safi United States
Ananthan Ambikairajah Australia
Christine M Burt Solorzano United States
Juliane Rothermel Germany
Michele Marongiu Italy
Gonzalo R. Pérez‐Roncero Spain
James L. Frost United States
Minfang Tao China
Stephanie Dean relative to Matthew Sussman United States Matthew Sussman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Matthew Sussman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Dean. The network helps show where Stephanie Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Dean

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Dean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Dean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Dean. Stephanie Dean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 0
3 0
4 16
5 1
6 3
7
Seeing the Forest and the Trees: A Historical and Conceptual Look at Danish Forest Schools.
14
8 26
9 9
10 9
11 6
12 10
13 6
14 1
15 8
16 22
17 13
18 1
19 118
20 1

About Stephanie Dean

Stephanie Dean is a scholar working on Toxicology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (2 papers) and Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (90 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (70 citations) and Transplantation (8 citations). Stephanie Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Junhui Tan, Edward R. O’Brien, Frans H. H. Leenen, Bradley T. Erford, Ian C. Hood, Amy E. Moseley, Iva Dostanic‐Larson, Xiaohong Hou, James W. Van Huysse and Roselyn White. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Science of The Total Environment and Acta Neuropathologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026