Stephanie Chow
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Immunology
- Co-authors
- Kwok‐Pui FungJudy Yuet‐Wa ChanDavid W. HedleyE. A. McCullochShing Fung ChowJohn K. ChanAmandeep MannOliver Dorigo
- Topics
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (8 papers)Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (8 papers)BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistryBiochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Partner nations
- United StatesHong KongChina
In The Last Decade
Stephanie Chow
27 papers receiving 479 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Molecular Biology 233
- Oncology 69
- Reproductive Medicine 69
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 67
- Immunology 67
Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Chow
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Chow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Chow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Chow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Chow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Chow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Chow. The network helps show where Stephanie Chow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Chow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Chow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Chow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Chow. Stephanie Chow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 81 | |
| 20 | 46 |
About Stephanie Chow
Stephanie Chow is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 487 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (8 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (8 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (69 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (39 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (46 citations). Stephanie Chow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include Kwok‐Pui Fung, Judy Yuet‐Wa Chan, David W. Hedley, E. A. McCulloch, Shing Fung Chow, John K. Chan, Amandeep Mann, Oliver Dorigo, Daniel S. Kapp and Jonathan S. Berek. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.