Stephan M. Dammer
- Water Science and Technology top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Mechanical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Detlef LohseNicolas BrémondG. Julius VancsóB.M. BorkentHolger SchönherrManish AroraE. Stefan KooijShangjiong Yang
- Topics
- Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (5 papers)Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (3 papers)Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsBulgaria
In The Last Decade
Stephan M. Dammer
10 papers receiving 732 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Water Science and Technology 386
- Biomedical Engineering 374
- Materials Chemistry 204
- Atmospheric Science 121
- Mechanical Engineering 120
Countries citing papers authored by Stephan M. Dammer
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephan M. Dammer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephan M. Dammer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephan M. Dammer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephan M. Dammer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephan M. Dammer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephan M. Dammer. The network helps show where Stephan M. Dammer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephan M. Dammer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephan M. Dammer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephan M. Dammer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephan M. Dammer. Stephan M. Dammer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | Experimental study on potential cavitation nuclei: surface nanobubbles and Bubbles Trapped in Well-Defined Nanopits | 0 |
| 3 | 183 | |
| 4 | 199 | |
| 5 | 132 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 148 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 5 |
About Stephan M. Dammer
Stephan M. Dammer is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 750 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (5 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (3 papers) and Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (386 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (76 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (374 citations). Stephan M. Dammer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Detlef Lohse, Nicolas Brémond, G. Julius Vancsó, B.M. Borkent, Holger Schönherr, Manish Arora, E. Stefan Kooij, Shangjiong Yang, Harold J. W. Zandvliet and Haye Hinrichsen. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Langmuir and Computer Physics Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.