Steffen Münch

772 citations
14 papers · 596 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Steffen Münch

14 papers receiving 578 citations

Peers

Steffen Münch
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Pharmaceutical Science 86
  • Cell Biology 171
  • Plant Science 336
  • Horticulture 7
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 17
Replace Luis Antônio Suíta de Castro with:
Luis Antônio Suíta de Castro Brazil
Dong Liang China
Audra S. Liggenstoffer United States
Sara Cuadros-Orellana Brazil
Daniel Garrido‐Sanz Spain
Lourdes Martínez‐Aguilar Mexico
Julian Quehenberger Austria
Orsolya Kedves Hungary
S. Bartoš Czechia
Steffen Münch relative to Luis Antônio Suíta de Castro Brazil Luis Antônio Suíta de Castro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Luis Antônio Suíta de Castro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steffen Münch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steffen Münch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steffen Münch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steffen Münch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steffen Münch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steffen Münch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steffen Münch. The network helps show where Steffen Münch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steffen Münch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steffen Münch Line = papers co-authored together Steffen Münch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2007165
2 2017111
3 1994104
4 201141
5 201040
6 202031
7 202122
8 202020
9 202119
10 202011
11 202110
12 20219
13 20118
14 20215

About Steffen Münch

Steffen Münch is a scholar working on Process Chemistry and Technology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (5 papers), Odor and Emission Control Technologies (5 papers), Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (4 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (4 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (2 papers), Fecal contamination and water quality (2 papers) and Fungal and yeast genetics research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (86 citations), Cell Biology (171 citations), Plant Science (336 citations), Horticulture (7 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (17 citations). Steffen Münch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Poland. Frequent co-authors include H. B. Deising, Norbert Sauer, Reinhard H.H. Neubert, Johannes Wohlrab, Daniela S. Floß, Roger Funk, Thomas Amon, Ulrich Nübel, Tina Kabelitz and Uwe Roesler. Their work appears in journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Environmental Microbiology, The Science of The Total Environment, Geoscientific model development and Environment International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact