Stefanie Klag

653 total citations
9 papers, 459 citations indexed

About

Stefanie Klag is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stefanie Klag has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 459 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Epidemiology and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Stefanie Klag's work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers). Stefanie Klag is often cited by papers focused on Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers). Stefanie Klag collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United States. Stefanie Klag's co-authors include Frances O’Callaghan, Peter A. Creed, Beverley Sparks, John T. Bowen, Graham L. Bradley, Melanie J. Zimmer‐Gembeck, Rae Thomas, Haley J. Webb and Graham Martin and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors and Children and Youth Services Review.

In The Last Decade

Stefanie Klag

9 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stefanie Klag Australia 8 193 137 114 98 89 9 459
Allan Wyllie New Zealand 10 67 0.3× 67 0.5× 195 1.7× 15 0.2× 52 0.6× 13 385
Kirsten I. Dunn Australia 9 171 0.9× 36 0.3× 13 0.1× 61 0.6× 86 1.0× 13 432
Kathryn Heley United States 12 134 0.7× 142 1.0× 79 0.7× 18 0.2× 102 1.1× 30 565
Catherine Goldberg United States 7 204 1.1× 62 0.5× 62 0.5× 21 0.2× 72 0.8× 8 469
Emiel W. Owens United States 11 186 1.0× 40 0.3× 31 0.3× 26 0.3× 39 0.4× 22 865
Gabriel Caluzzi Australia 11 70 0.4× 92 0.7× 226 2.0× 12 0.1× 19 0.2× 40 397
Marian Peacock United Kingdom 11 132 0.7× 120 0.9× 28 0.2× 11 0.1× 29 0.3× 25 407
Christopher Holmberg Sweden 10 112 0.6× 134 1.0× 7 0.1× 28 0.3× 48 0.5× 37 464
Kanayo Umeh United Kingdom 12 76 0.4× 78 0.6× 61 0.5× 8 0.1× 65 0.7× 39 410
Wies Weijts Netherlands 9 34 0.2× 50 0.4× 20 0.2× 47 0.5× 35 0.4× 9 385

Countries citing papers authored by Stefanie Klag

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stefanie Klag's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefanie Klag with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefanie Klag more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stefanie Klag

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefanie Klag. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefanie Klag. The network helps show where Stefanie Klag may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stefanie Klag

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stefanie Klag. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stefanie Klag based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stefanie Klag. Stefanie Klag is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
2.
Zimmer‐Gembeck, Melanie J., Haley J. Webb, Rae Thomas, & Stefanie Klag. (2015). A new measure of toddler parenting practices and associations with attachment and mothers' sensitivity, competence, and enjoyment of parenting. Early Child Development and Care. 185(9). 1422–1436. 24 indexed citations
3.
Klag, Stefanie, Peter A. Creed, & Frances O’Callaghan. (2010). Early Motivation, Well-being, and Treatment Engagement of Chronic Substance Users Undergoing Treatment in a Therapeutic Community Setting. Substance Use & Misuse. 45(7-8). 1112–1130. 27 indexed citations
4.
Klag, Stefanie, Peter A. Creed, & Frances O’Callaghan. (2006). Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure perceived coercion to enter treatment for substance abuse.. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 20(4). 463–470. 20 indexed citations
5.
Klag, Stefanie, Frances O’Callaghan, & Peter A. Creed. (2005). The Use of Legal Coercion in the Treatment of Substance Abusers: An Overview and Critical Analysis of Thirty Years of Research. Substance Use & Misuse. 40(12). 1777–1795. 143 indexed citations
6.
Klag, Stefanie, Peter A. Creed, & Frances O’Callaghan. (2004). The role and importance of motivation in the treatment of substance abuse. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 25(4). 291–317. 1 indexed citations
7.
Klag, Stefanie & Graham L. Bradley. (2004). The role of hardiness in stress and illness: An exploration of the effect of negative affectivity and gender. British Journal of Health Psychology. 9(2). 137–161. 82 indexed citations
8.
O’Callaghan, Frances, et al.. (2004). Drug and crime cycle: Evaluating traditional methods versus diversion strategies for drug-related offences. Australian Psychologist. 39(3). 188–200. 17 indexed citations
9.
Sparks, Beverley, John T. Bowen, & Stefanie Klag. (2003). Restaurants and the tourist market. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 15(1). 6–13. 132 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026